26 lines
888 B
Markdown
26 lines
888 B
Markdown
# Example 7 — Revision from a weak chart request
|
|
|
|
## User-style prompt
|
|
|
|
I was thinking of using a radar chart for these benchmark results. Can you improve this into something publication-quality?
|
|
|
|
## Expected skill interpretation
|
|
|
|
- artifact: revision task
|
|
- maturity: review/revision
|
|
- structure: likely single figure or figure+table alternative
|
|
- goal: replace a weak chart choice with a stronger one
|
|
|
|
## Preferred route
|
|
|
|
- review the proposed radar choice critically
|
|
- recommend a stronger alternative such as grouped scatter, line, or a table depending on the claim
|
|
- only keep radar if the profile comparison is genuinely the right representation
|
|
|
|
## Minimum acceptable output shape
|
|
|
|
- explain why the original chart is weak or risky
|
|
- recommend a better artifact type
|
|
- provide the replacement implementation route
|
|
- include targeted QA / revision notes, not vague style comments
|