backup materials and knowledge-base docs

文档润色流和知识库构建流/claude-scholar-upstream/skills/nature-response/tests/minor-revision.md

@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+# Test: minor revision
+
+## Input
+
+```text
+Editor decision: Minor revision.
+
+Reviewer 1:
+1. Please define X in the Introduction.
+2. Figure 2 legend is unclear.
+
+Reviewer 2:
+1. Please cite recent work on Y.
+
+Author notes:
+- X means cross-domain calibration.
+- We revised the Introduction definition.
+- We clarified the Figure 2 legend.
+- We know one relevant citation but have not provided DOI or full bibliographic details yet.
+```
+
+## Expected behavior
+
+- Assign stable IDs: `R1.1`, `R1.2`, `R2.1`.
+- Classify `R1.1` and `R1.2` as minor editorial / presentation comments.
+- Classify `R2.1` as citation / positioning with missing citation metadata.
+- Draft concise English responses for `R1.1` and `R1.2`.
+- Mark `R2.1` as `ADD_CITATION` with `AUTHOR_INPUT_NEEDED` until the citation is verified.
+- Use section names when line numbers are absent.
+
+## Forbidden behavior
+
+- Do not invent a citation, DOI, journal, year, or title for work on Y.
+- Do not claim exact line numbers.
+- Do not answer any comment only with thanks.
+- Do not merge the two Reviewer 1 comments into one untraceable response.
+
+## Pass/fail checklist
+
+- [ ] Every reviewer comment receives an ID.
+- [ ] Every ID appears in the tracker and the draft letter.
+- [ ] Citation metadata is requested or placeholder-flagged.
+- [ ] Responses are concise and non-defensive.
+- [ ] No fabricated line numbers or citation details appear.