TWBG_Materials/文档润色流和知识库构建流/claude-scholar-upstream/skills/nature-response/tests/minor-revision.md

Test: minor revision

Input

Editor decision: Minor revision.

Reviewer 1:
1. Please define X in the Introduction.
2. Figure 2 legend is unclear.

Reviewer 2:
1. Please cite recent work on Y.

Author notes:
- X means cross-domain calibration.
- We revised the Introduction definition.
- We clarified the Figure 2 legend.
- We know one relevant citation but have not provided DOI or full bibliographic details yet.

Expected behavior

• Assign stable IDs: R1.1, R1.2, R2.1.
• Classify R1.1 and R1.2 as minor editorial / presentation comments.
• Classify R2.1 as citation / positioning with missing citation metadata.
• Draft concise English responses for R1.1 and R1.2.
• Mark R2.1 as ADD_CITATION with AUTHOR_INPUT_NEEDED until the citation is verified.
• Use section names when line numbers are absent.

Forbidden behavior

• Do not invent a citation, DOI, journal, year, or title for work on Y.
• Do not claim exact line numbers.
• Do not answer any comment only with thanks.
• Do not merge the two Reviewer 1 comments into one untraceable response.

Pass/fail checklist

• Every reviewer comment receives an ID.
• Every ID appears in the tracker and the draft letter.
• Citation metadata is requested or placeholder-flagged.
• Responses are concise and non-defensive.
• No fabricated line numbers or citation details appear.