455 lines
131 KiB
JSON
455 lines
131 KiB
JSON
{
|
||
"id": "conv-1776867998806-2810mb15q",
|
||
"providerId": "claude",
|
||
"title": "/init",
|
||
"titleGenerationStatus": "failed",
|
||
"createdAt": 1776867998806,
|
||
"updatedAt": 1776871099224,
|
||
"lastResponseAt": 1776871099224,
|
||
"sessionId": "62e5979f-c990-4d83-aa0b-c167cdeaf78b",
|
||
"providerState": {
|
||
"providerSessionId": "62e5979f-c990-4d83-aa0b-c167cdeaf78b",
|
||
"previousProviderSessionIds": [
|
||
"4a5d7097-1968-4444-9cdf-3e49c619b2a8"
|
||
],
|
||
"subagentData": {
|
||
"tool_Jo6BoGbY2bff7vrzFP8YxRc6": {
|
||
"id": "tool_Jo6BoGbY2bff7vrzFP8YxRc6",
|
||
"description": "Explore vault for templates",
|
||
"prompt": "Search the vault at E:\\my-vault for any existing templates, system design documents, or patterns that could inform how to structure a new \"自动语义分割系统/系统设计.md\" (Automatic Semantic Segmentation System Design) document. Look for:\n1. Any template files or folders\n2. Existing system design or architecture documents\n3. Any files related to semantic segmentation, computer vision, or deep learning\n4. Common frontmatter or metadata patterns used in this vault\n5. Any README or index files that explain the vault structure\n\nReturn a summary of what you find, including file paths and relevant content excerpts.",
|
||
"status": "completed",
|
||
"toolCalls": [
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "tool_gMC2QEyayAw6WRaKo9T75gjP",
|
||
"name": "Bash",
|
||
"input": {
|
||
"command": "ls -la /e/my-vault",
|
||
"description": "List root directory contents"
|
||
},
|
||
"status": "completed",
|
||
"isExpanded": false,
|
||
"result": "total 32\ndrwxr-xr-x 1 Administrator 197121 0 Apr 22 22:45 .\ndrwxr-xr-x 1 Administrator 197121 0 Apr 13 14:02 ..\ndrwxr-xr-x 1 Administrator 197121 0 Apr 13 14:06 .claude\ndrwxr-xr-x 1 Administrator 197121 0 Apr 13 14:10 .claudian\ndrwxr-xr-x 1 Administrator 197121 0 Apr 22 22:52 .git\ndrwxr-xr-x 1 Administrator 197121 0 Apr 13 15:17 .obsidian\ndrwxr-xr-x 1 Administrator 197121 0 Apr 14 13:31 Dehaze\ndrwxr-xr-x 1 Administrator 197121 0 Apr 22 22:49 Excalidraw\ndrwxr-xr-x 1 Administrator 197121 0 Apr 13 12:58 copilot\ndrwxr-xr-x 1 Administrator 197121 0 Apr 22 22:24 自动语义分割系统"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "tool_AKtt2aIsc6arZ38zCkX8eWm5",
|
||
"name": "Glob",
|
||
"input": {
|
||
"pattern": "**/template*",
|
||
"path": "E:\\my-vault"
|
||
},
|
||
"status": "completed",
|
||
"isExpanded": false,
|
||
"result": ".obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\tutor-setup\\references\\templates.md"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "tool_B5RCMCCpSJCp5YjHrljipFLu",
|
||
"name": "Glob",
|
||
"input": {
|
||
"pattern": "**/*design*",
|
||
"path": "E:\\my-vault"
|
||
},
|
||
"status": "completed",
|
||
"isExpanded": false,
|
||
"result": "No files found"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "tool_9duHjOkWvssQFHbiEi3ADzpD",
|
||
"name": "Glob",
|
||
"input": {
|
||
"pattern": "**/*系统*",
|
||
"path": "E:\\my-vault"
|
||
},
|
||
"status": "completed",
|
||
"isExpanded": false,
|
||
"result": "自动语义分割系统\\系统设计.md"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "tool_thgeDzmemZIl8vIEiMze6fSx",
|
||
"name": "Grep",
|
||
"input": {
|
||
"pattern": "semantic.?segmentation|computer.?vision|deep.?learning",
|
||
"path": "E:\\my-vault",
|
||
"-i": true
|
||
},
|
||
"status": "completed",
|
||
"isExpanded": false,
|
||
"result": "Found 5 files\nDehaze\\Papers\\ORI_MD\\translation-去雾\\translation-去雾_model.json\nDehaze\\Papers\\ORI_MD\\translation-去雾\\translation-去雾_content_list_v2.json\nDehaze\\Papers\\ORI_MD\\translation-去雾\\translation-去雾_content_list.json\nDehaze\\Papers\\ORI_MD\\translation-去雾\\translation-去雾_middle.json\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper-reviewer\\references\\top_journals_by_field.md"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "tool_wil9agsXfFr9GLkPDZF36t3u",
|
||
"name": "Bash",
|
||
"input": {
|
||
"command": "ls -la /e/my-vault/自动语义分割系统/",
|
||
"description": "List semantic segmentation directory"
|
||
},
|
||
"status": "completed",
|
||
"isExpanded": false,
|
||
"result": "total 5\ndrwxr-xr-x 1 Administrator 197121 0 Apr 22 22:24 .\ndrwxr-xr-x 1 Administrator 197121 0 Apr 22 22:45 ..\n-rw-r--r-- 1 Administrator 197121 1 Apr 22 22:25 系统设计.md"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "tool_UVKioGxR8W9lsVzEeefp7uBS",
|
||
"name": "Glob",
|
||
"input": {
|
||
"pattern": "**/README*",
|
||
"path": "E:\\my-vault"
|
||
},
|
||
"status": "completed",
|
||
"isExpanded": false,
|
||
"result": ".obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\README.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\README.zh-TW.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\examples\\showcase\\README.md"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "tool_ieDP7adMzEllwcDrsNW2l74Y",
|
||
"name": "Glob",
|
||
"input": {
|
||
"pattern": "**/index*",
|
||
"path": "E:\\my-vault"
|
||
},
|
||
"status": "completed",
|
||
"isExpanded": false,
|
||
"result": ".obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\.git\\index\n.git\\index"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "tool_UfZOwy7to9YnJubcIis9YD9A",
|
||
"name": "Read",
|
||
"input": {
|
||
"file_path": "E:\\my-vault\\.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\tutor-setup\\references\\templates.md"
|
||
},
|
||
"status": "completed",
|
||
"isExpanded": false,
|
||
"result": "1\t# Templates Reference\n2\t\n3\t## Vault Folder Structure\n4\t\n5\t```\n6\tStudyVault/\n7\t 00-Dashboard/ # MOC + cheat sheets + Exam Traps\n8\t 01-<Topic1>/ # Concept notes per domain\n9\t 02-<Topic2>/\n10\t ...\n11\t NN-문제풀이/ (or Practice/)\n12\t```\n13\t\n14\t## Dashboard MOC Template\n15\t\n16\t```markdown\n17\t---\n18\tsource_pdf: <list all source files>\n19\tpart: <part numbers or \"all\">\n20\tkeywords: MOC, study map, <subject>\n21\t---\n22\t\n23\t# <Subject> Study Map\n24\t\n25\t#dashboard #<subject-tag>\n26\t\n27\t## Overview\n28\t- Exam/certification info (if applicable)\n29\t- Domain weights or topic importance\n30\t\n31\t## Topic Map\n32\t| Section | Source | Notes | Status |\n33\t|---------|--------|-------|--------|\n34\t| Topic 1 | Part 1 | [[Note 1]], [[Note 2]] | [ ] |\n35\t\n36\t## Practice Notes\n37\t| 문제셋 | 문항 수 | 링크 |\n38\t|--------|---------|------|\n39\t| Topic 1 | N문제 | [[Topic 1 Practice]] |\n40\t\n41\t## Study Tools\n42\t| 도구 | 설명 | 링크 |\n43\t|------|------|------|\n44\t| Exam Traps | 시험 함정/오답 포인트 모음 | [[Exam Traps]] |\n45\t| Quick Reference | 전체 치트시트 | [[빠른 참조]] |\n46\t\n47\t## Tag Index\n48\t| Tag | 관련 주제 | 규칙 |\n49\t|-----|-----------|------|\n50\t| `#tag-name` | Brief description | 상위/도메인/세부/기법/유형 |\n51\t\n52\t> **태그 규칙**: <1-line summary of hierarchy rule>\n53\t\n54\t## Weak Areas\n55\t- [ ] Area needing review → [[Relevant Note]] → [[Exam Traps]]\n56\t\n57\t## Non-core Topic Policy\n58\t| Source | Content | Handling |\n59\t|--------|---------|----------|\n60\t| <file> | <description> | **Excluded** — reason |\n61\t```\n62\t\n63\t## Quick Reference Template\n64\t\n65\t- **Every section heading MUST include `→ [[Concept Note]]` link**\n66\t- One-line summary table per concept/term\n67\t- Grouped by category\n68\t- All key formulas and condition expressions\n69\t- \"Must-know formulas/patterns\" section at bottom with `→ [[Note]]` links\n70\t\n71\t## Exam Traps Template\n72\t\n73\t```markdown\n74\t---\n75\tkeywords: exam traps, weak areas, common mistakes\n76\t---\n77\t\n78\t# Exam Traps (시험 함정 포인트)\n79\t\n80\t#dashboard #exam-traps\n81\t\n82\t> [!warning] 이 노트의 목적\n83\t> 시험에서 자주 틀리거나 헷갈리는 포인트만 모은 **오답/함정 노트**입니다.\n84\t\n85\t## <Topic 1>\n86\t\n87\t> [!danger]- Trap: <Short description>\n88\t> - <What the trap is>\n89\t> - <Why it's confusing>\n90\t> - <The correct answer/approach>\n91\t> - [[Related Concept Note]]\n92\t\n93\t---\n94\t\n95\t## Related\n96\t- [[MOC - <Subject>]] → Weak Areas 섹션\n97\t- [[빠른 참조]]\n98\t```\n99\t\n100\t## Concept Note Template\n101\t\n102\t```markdown\n103\t---\n104\tsource_pdf: <filename.pdf — MUST match verified Phase 1 mapping>\n105\tpart: <part number>\n106\tkeywords: <3-5 English keywords>\n107\t---\n108\t\n109\t# <Title> (<Importance: ★~★★★>)\n110\t\n111\t#<tag-from-registry> #<tag-from-registry>\n112\t\n113\t## Overview Table (한눈에 비교)\n114\t| Item | Key Point |\n115\t|------|-----------|\n116\t| A | ... |\n117\t\n118\t## <Concept 1>\n119\tConcise explanation (3-5 lines max).\n120\t- Bullet points for key facts\n121\t- Use **bold** for critical terms\n122\t\n123\t---\n124\t\n125\t## Exam/Test Patterns (시험 빈출 패턴)\n126\t| Scenario/Keyword | Answer |\n127\t|-------------------|--------|\n128\t| \"keyword X\" | **Solution Y** |\n129\t\n130\t## Related Notes\n131\t- [[Other Note 1]]\n132\t```\n133\t\n134\t### Formatting Rules\n135\t\n136\t- `[[wiki-links]]` for cross-references\n137\t- `> [!tip]`, `> [!important]`, `> [!warning]` callouts\n138\t- Comparison tables over prose; bold for key vocabulary\n139\t\n140\t### Visualization Rule\n141\t\n142\tInclude ASCII diagrams when applicable:\n143\t- Processes/stages → timeline or sequence diagram\n144\t- Signal/data flow → flow DAG\n145\t- Strategy comparisons → quantitative table\n146\t- State-based behavior → state transition diagram\n147\t\n148\t### Simplification-with-Exceptions Rule\n149\t\n150\tGeneral statements must check for edge cases — add `> [!warning]` or link to exception details.\n151\t\n152\t## Practice Question Template\n153\t\n154\t```markdown\n155\t---\n156\tsource_pdf: <filename.pdf — MUST match verified Phase 1 mapping>\n157\tpart: <part number>\n158\tkeywords: practice, <topic keywords>\n159\t---\n160\t\n161\t# <Topic> Practice (N questions)\n162\t\n163\t#practice #<topic-tag>\n164\t\n165\t## Related Concepts\n166\t- [[Concept Note 1]]\n167\t\n168\t> [!hint]- 핵심 패턴 (클릭하여 보기)\n169\t> | Keyword | Answer |\n170\t> |---------|--------|\n171\t> | pattern 1 | **Solution** |\n172\t\n173\t---\n174\t\n175\t## Question 1 - <Short Label> [recall]\n176\t> Scenario summary in one line\n177\t\n178\t> [!answer]- 정답 보기\n179\t> Answer text here with explanation.\n180\t\n181\t---\n182\t\n183\t## Question 2 - <Short Label> [application]\n184\t> Given this scenario, what would you do?\n185\t\n186\t> [!answer]- 정답 보기\n187\t> Answer with applied reasoning.\n188\t\n189\t---\n190\t\n191\t## Question 3 - <Short Label> [analysis]\n192\t> Compare X and Y in this context. Which is better and why?\n193\t\n194\t> [!answer]- 정답 보기\n195\t> Comparative analysis answer.\n196\t\n197\t---\n198\t\n199\t> [!summary]- 패턴 요약 (클릭하여 보기)\n200\t> | Keyword | Answer |\n201\t> |---------|--------|\n202\t> | ... | ... |\n203\t```\n204\t\n205\t### Practice Question Rules\n206\t\n207\t- Every topic folder MUST have a practice file (8+ questions)\n208\t- **Answer hiding**: ALL answers use `> [!answer]- 정답 보기` fold callout\n209\t- **Patterns**: `> [!hint]-` / `> [!summary]-` fold callouts (MANDATORY)\n210\t- **Question type diversity**: tag `[recall]`, `[application]`, `[analysis]` in heading\n211\t - ≥60% recall, ≥20% application, ≥2 analysis per file\n212\t- Scenario in one `>` blockquote line; answer 1-3 lines in fold\n213\t- `## Related Concepts` with `[[wiki-links]]` (MANDATORY)\n214\t"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "tool_Nxs0kJegSS5mhZRwjjSqsevm",
|
||
"name": "Grep",
|
||
"input": {
|
||
"pattern": "^---",
|
||
"path": "E:\\my-vault",
|
||
"glob": "*.md",
|
||
"output_mode": "files_with_matches"
|
||
},
|
||
"status": "completed",
|
||
"isExpanded": false,
|
||
"result": "Found 135 files\nExcalidraw\\Drawing 2026-04-22 22.49.50.excalidraw.md\nExcalidraw\\Drawing 2026-04-22 22.49.48.excalidraw.md\nExcalidraw\\Drawing 2026-04-22 22.40.08.excalidraw.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\shared\\style_calibration_protocol.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\shared\\handoff_schemas.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\shared\\mode_spectrum.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\deep-research\\templates\\preregistration_template.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\deep-research\\templates\\prisma_protocol_template.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\deep-research\\templates\\prisma_report_template.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\deep-research\\templates\\research_brief_template.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\deep-research\\templates\\evidence_assessment_template.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\deep-research\\references\\socratic_questioning_framework.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\deep-research\\references\\systematic_review_toolkit.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\deep-research\\references\\preregistration_guide.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\deep-research\\references\\semantic_scholar_api_protocol.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\deep-research\\references\\mode_selection_guide.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\deep-research\\references\\irb_decision_tree.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\deep-research\\references\\literature_monitoring_strategies.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\deep-research\\references\\equator_reporting_guidelines.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\deep-research\\references\\ethics_checklist.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\deep-research\\references\\failure_paths.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\deep-research\\examples\\systematic_review.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\deep-research\\examples\\review_mode.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\deep-research\\examples\\socratic_guided_research.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\deep-research\\examples\\fact_check_mode.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\deep-research\\examples\\handoff_to_paper.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\deep-research\\examples\\policy_analysis.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\deep-research\\examples\\exploratory_research.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\deep-research\\agents\\research_question_agent.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\deep-research\\agents\\socratic_mentor_agent.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\deep-research\\agents\\devils_advocate_agent.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-pipeline\\templates\\pipeline_status_template.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\deep-research\\SKILL.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-pipeline\\references\\score_trajectory_protocol.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-pipeline\\references\\team_collaboration_protocol.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-pipeline\\references\\plagiarism_detection_protocol.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-pipeline\\references\\mode_advisor.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-pipeline\\references\\pipeline_state_machine.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-pipeline\\references\\ai_research_failure_modes.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-pipeline\\examples\\integrity_failure_recovery.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-pipeline\\examples\\mid_entry_example.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-pipeline\\examples\\full_pipeline_example.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-pipeline\\agents\\state_tracker_agent.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-pipeline\\agents\\integrity_verification_agent.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-pipeline\\agents\\pipeline_orchestrator_agent.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\templates\\revision_tracking_template.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\templates\\theoretical_paper_template.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-pipeline\\SKILL.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\templates\\funding_statement_template.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\templates\\imrad_template.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\templates\\literature_review_template.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\templates\\policy_brief_template.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\templates\\bilingual_abstract_template.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\templates\\case_study_template.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\templates\\conference_paper_template.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\templates\\credit_statement_template.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\references\\workflow_phase_details.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\references\\writing_quality_check.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\references\\statistical_visualization_standards.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\references\\venue_disclosure_policies.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\references\\vlm_figure_verification.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\references\\mode_selection_guide.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\references\\paper_structure_patterns.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\references\\disclosure_mode_protocol.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\references\\failure_paths.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\references\\funding_statement_guide.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\references\\journal_submission_guide.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\references\\credit_authorship_guide.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\references\\citation_format_switcher.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\references\\anti_leakage_protocol.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\references\\apa7_chinese_citation_guide.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\examples\\revision_recovery_example.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\examples\\literature_review_example.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\examples\\plan_mode_guided_writing.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\examples\\revision_mode_example.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\agents\\visualization_agent.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\examples\\chinese_paper_example.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\examples\\imrad_hei_example.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\agents\\revision_coach_agent.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\agents\\socratic_mentor_agent.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\agents\\draft_writer_agent.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\agents\\formatter_agent.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\agents\\intake_agent.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\agents\\abstract_bilingual_agent.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\agents\\argument_builder_agent.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper-reviewer\\templates\\revision_response_template.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\SKILL.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper-reviewer\\references\\top_journals_by_field.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper-reviewer\\templates\\editorial_decision_template.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper-reviewer\\templates\\peer_review_report_template.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper-reviewer\\references\\review_criteria_framework.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper-reviewer\\references\\statistical_reporting_standards.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper-reviewer\\references\\quality_rubrics.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper-reviewer\\references\\calibration_mode_protocol.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper-reviewer\\references\\editorial_decision_standards.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper-reviewer\\examples\\interdisciplinary_review_example.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper-reviewer\\examples\\hei_paper_review_example.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper-reviewer\\agents\\eic_agent.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper-reviewer\\agents\\field_analyst_agent.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper-reviewer\\agents\\methodology_reviewer_agent.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper-reviewer\\agents\\perspective_reviewer_agent.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper-reviewer\\agents\\editorial_synthesizer_agent.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper-reviewer\\agents\\devils_advocate_reviewer_agent.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper-reviewer\\agents\\domain_reviewer_agent.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper-reviewer\\SKILL.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\README.zh-TW.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\README.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\MODE_REGISTRY.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\CONTRIBUTING.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\.claude\\CHANGELOG.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\tutor\\SKILL.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\tutor-setup\\references\\quality-checklist.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\tutor-setup\\references\\templates.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\tutor-setup\\references\\codebase-templates.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\tutor-setup\\SKILL.md\ncopilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Clip Web Page.md\ncopilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Clip YouTube Transcript.md\ncopilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Rewrite as tweet thread.md\ncopilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Rewrite as tweet.md\ncopilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Remove URLs.md\ncopilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Generate glossary.md\ncopilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Generate table of contents.md\ncopilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Make longer.md\ncopilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Make shorter.md\ncopilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Emojify.md\ncopilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Explain like I am 5.md\ncopilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Simplify.md\ncopilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Summarize.md\ncopilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Translate to Chinese.md\ncopilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Fix grammar and spelling.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\defuddle\\SKILL.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\obsidian-bases\\SKILL.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\obsidian-cli\\SKILL.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\obsidian-markdown\\references\\PROPERTIES.md\n.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\obsidian-markdown\\SKILL.md"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "tool_knVODIORcAHm7cEuS6y9APtG",
|
||
"name": "Read",
|
||
"input": {
|
||
"file_path": "E:\\my-vault\\自动语义分割系统\\系统设计.md"
|
||
},
|
||
"status": "completed",
|
||
"isExpanded": false,
|
||
"result": "1\t#"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "tool_kAYusSKPLntPADtlWp116hu6",
|
||
"name": "Read",
|
||
"input": {
|
||
"file_path": "E:\\my-vault\\.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\deep-research\\templates\\research_brief_template.md"
|
||
},
|
||
"status": "completed",
|
||
"isExpanded": false,
|
||
"result": "1\t# Research Brief Template\n2\t\n3\t## Purpose\n4\tStandard output format for `quick` mode research. Concise, actionable, evidence-based.\n5\t\n6\t## Template\n7\t\n8\t```markdown\n9\t# Research Brief\n10\t\n11\t**Title**: [Descriptive title in sentence case]\n12\t**Date**: [YYYY-MM-DD]\n13\t**Mode**: Quick Research Brief\n14\t**AI Disclosure**: This brief was produced with AI-assisted research tools. All findings are verified against cited sources.\n15\t\n16\t---\n17\t\n18\t## Executive Summary\n19\t[100-150 words. State the question, key findings, and main implication.]\n20\t\n21\t---\n22\t\n23\t## Background & Research Question\n24\t\n25\t### Context\n26\t[2-3 paragraphs providing necessary background for the reader.]\n27\t\n28\t### Research Question\n29\t> [The refined research question, as a single clear sentence.]\n30\t\n31\t### Scope\n32\t- **In scope**: [what this brief covers]\n33\t- **Out of scope**: [what this brief does not cover]\n34\t\n35\t---\n36\t\n37\t## Key Findings\n38\t\n39\t### Finding 1: [Title]\n40\t[2-3 sentences with citation(s)]\n41\t\n42\t**Evidence strength**: [Strong / Moderate / Emerging]\n43\t**Source(s)**: [Brief citation]\n44\t\n45\t### Finding 2: [Title]\n46\t[2-3 sentences with citation(s)]\n47\t\n48\t**Evidence strength**: [Strong / Moderate / Emerging]\n49\t**Source(s)**: [Brief citation]\n50\t\n51\t### Finding 3: [Title]\n52\t[2-3 sentences with citation(s)]\n53\t\n54\t**Evidence strength**: [Strong / Moderate / Emerging]\n55\t**Source(s)**: [Brief citation]\n56\t\n57\t[Add more findings as needed, typically 3-5]\n58\t\n59\t---\n60\t\n61\t## Analysis & Implications\n62\t\n63\t### What This Means\n64\t[2-3 paragraphs interpreting the findings. Connect evidence to practical implications.]\n65\t\n66\t### Recommendations\n67\t1. [Actionable recommendation with evidence basis]\n68\t2. [Actionable recommendation with evidence basis]\n69\t3. [Actionable recommendation with evidence basis]\n70\t\n71\t---\n72\t\n73\t## Limitations\n74\t- [Limitation 1: e.g., search scope, time constraints]\n75\t- [Limitation 2: e.g., evidence gaps]\n76\t- [Limitation 3: e.g., AI-assisted analysis limitations]\n77\t\n78\t---\n79\t\n80\t## References\n81\t[APA 7.0 format, 5-10 references typical for quick mode]\n82\t\n83\t1. [Reference 1]\n84\t2. [Reference 2]\n85\t...\n86\t```\n87\t\n88\t## Usage Notes\n89\t- Target length: 500-1,500 words\n90\t- Minimum 5 cited sources\n91\t- Every finding must have at least one citation\n92\t- Evidence strength ratings should align with source quality hierarchy\n93\t- Keep language accessible — this is a brief, not a journal article\n94\t"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "tool_yxikvM0N0mJ099RpvuBrwyry",
|
||
"name": "Read",
|
||
"input": {
|
||
"file_path": "E:\\my-vault\\.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\templates\\imrad_template.md"
|
||
},
|
||
"status": "blocked",
|
||
"isExpanded": false,
|
||
"result": "1\t# IMRaD Paper Template\n2\t\n3\t## Usage\n4\tThis template provides the section-by-section skeleton for an empirical research paper following the Introduction-Method-Results-and-Discussion structure.\n5\t\n6\tReplace all `[bracketed text]` with your content. Delete instructional comments after use.\n7\t\n8\t---\n9\t\n10\t# [Paper Title in Title Case]\n11\t\n12\t**Author(s):** [Author Name(s)]\n13\t**Affiliation(s):** [Department, Institution]\n14\t**Corresponding Author:** [Name, Email]\n15\t**Date:** [Date]\n16\t\n17\t---\n18\t\n19\t## Abstract\n20\t\n21\t[Background: 1-2 sentences establishing context and the problem.]\n22\t[Purpose: 1 sentence stating the research objective.]\n23\t[Method: 1-2 sentences describing the approach and data.]\n24\t[Findings: 2-3 sentences presenting key results with specific details.]\n25\t[Implications: 1-2 sentences stating significance.]\n26\t\n27\t**Keywords**: [keyword1], [keyword2], [keyword3], [keyword4], [keyword5]\n28\t\n29\t---\n30\t\n31\t## 1. Introduction\n32\t\n33\t### 1.1 Context and Background\n34\t[Establish the broader context. What is the landscape? Why does this topic matter?]\n35\t[2-3 paragraphs with citations]\n36\t\n37\t### 1.2 Problem Statement\n38\t[What specific problem or gap exists? Why is it important to address?]\n39\t[1-2 paragraphs with citations]\n40\t\n41\t### 1.3 Research Gap\n42\t[What have previous studies missed or not adequately addressed?]\n43\t[1 paragraph summarizing the gap based on literature]\n44\t\n45\t### 1.4 Purpose and Research Questions\n46\t[State the purpose clearly. List research questions.]\n47\t\n48\tThe purpose of this study is to [verb] [object] in [context].\n49\t\n50\tThe following research questions guide this study:\n51\t1. **RQ1**: [Question 1]?\n52\t2. **RQ2**: [Question 2]?\n53\t3. **RQ3**: [Question 3]? *(if applicable)*\n54\t\n55\t### 1.5 Significance of the Study\n56\t[Why does this research matter? Who benefits?]\n57\t[1 paragraph]\n58\t\n59\t---\n60\t\n61\t## 2. Literature Review\n62\t\n63\t### 2.1 Theoretical Framework\n64\t[What theory/framework underpins this study?]\n65\t[1-2 paragraphs with citations]\n66\t\n67\t### 2.2 [Theme 1 Title]\n68\t[Review relevant literature on theme 1.]\n69\t[2-3 paragraphs with citations]\n70\t\n71\t### 2.3 [Theme 2 Title]\n72\t[Review relevant literature on theme 2.]\n73\t[2-3 paragraphs with citations]\n74\t\n75\t### 2.4 [Theme 3 Title]\n76\t[Review relevant literature on theme 3.]\n77\t[2-3 paragraphs with citations]\n78\t\n79\t### 2.5 Summary and Conceptual Framework\n80\t[Synthesize the themes. Present conceptual framework if applicable.]\n81\t[1-2 paragraphs]\n82\t\n83\t---\n84\t\n85\t## 3. Methodology\n86\t\n87\t### 3.1 Research Design\n88\t[Describe the overall research design and justify the choice.]\n89\t[1 paragraph]\n90\t\n91\t### 3.2 Participants / Sample\n92\t[Who/what was studied? How were they selected? Sample size and characteristics.]\n93\t[1-2 paragraphs]\n94\t\n95\t### 3.3 Data Collection\n96\t[What data were collected? How? When? By whom?]\n97\t[1-2 paragraphs]\n98\t\n99\t### 3.4 Instruments / Measures\n100\t[What instruments were used? Reliability and validity evidence.]\n101\t[1-2 paragraphs]\n102\t\n103\t### 3.5 Data Analysis\n104\t[What analytical methods were applied? Software used?]\n105\t[1 paragraph]\n106\t\n107\t### 3.6 Validity and Reliability\n108\t[How were quality criteria ensured?]\n109\t[1 paragraph]\n110\t\n111\t### 3.7 Ethical Considerations\n112\t[IRB approval, informed consent, data protection.]\n113\t[1 paragraph]\n114\t\n115\t---\n116\t\n117\t## 4. Results / Findings\n118\t\n119\t### 4.1 Descriptive Overview\n120\t[Present descriptive statistics or overview of data.]\n121\t[Include Table 1: Descriptive Statistics if applicable]\n122\t\n123\t### 4.2 [Finding for RQ1]\n124\t[Present results addressing RQ1.]\n125\t[Include tables/figures as needed]\n126\t\n127\t### 4.3 [Finding for RQ2]\n128\t[Present results addressing RQ2.]\n129\t[Include tables/figures as needed]\n130\t\n131\t### 4.4 [Finding for RQ3] *(if applicable)*\n132\t[Present results addressing RQ3.]\n133\t\n134\t---\n135\t\n136\t## 5. Discussion\n137\t\n138\t### 5.1 Summary of Key Findings\n139\t[Brief overview of main results.]\n140\t[1 paragraph]\n141\t\n142\t### 5.2 Interpretation and Comparison with Literature\n143\t[What do the findings mean? How do they compare with prior studies?]\n144\t[2-3 paragraphs with citations]\n145\t\n146\t### 5.3 Theoretical Implications\n147\t[How do findings advance theory?]\n148\t[1-2 paragraphs]\n149\t\n150\t### 5.4 Practical Implications\n151\t[How can practitioners, policymakers, or institutions use these findings?]\n152\t[1-2 paragraphs]\n153\t\n154\t### 5.5 Limitations\n155\t[Be honest about study limitations.]\n156\t[1 paragraph, typically 3-5 limitations]\n157\t\n158\t### 5.6 Future Research Directions\n159\t[What should future studies investigate?]\n160\t[1 paragraph]\n161\t\n162\t---\n163\t\n164\t## 6. Conclusion\n165\t[Summarize the paper's contribution in 1-2 paragraphs. End with a strong closing statement.]\n166\t\n167\t---\n168\t\n169\t## AI Disclosure\n170\t[This paper was prepared with the assistance of AI-powered academic writing tools. All content has been reviewed and verified by the author(s).]\n171\t\n172\t---\n173\t\n174\t## References\n175\t\n176\t[APA 7th edition format. Hanging indent. Alphabetical order.]\n177\t\n178\t---\n179\t\n180\t## Appendices *(if applicable)*\n181\t\n182\t### Appendix A: [Title]\n183\t[Supplementary materials]\n184\t"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "tool_WUNOAwG7boznJoCB5luuNpRU",
|
||
"name": "Read",
|
||
"input": {
|
||
"file_path": "E:\\my-vault\\.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\obsidian-markdown\\references\\PROPERTIES.md"
|
||
},
|
||
"status": "completed",
|
||
"isExpanded": false,
|
||
"result": "1\t# Properties (Frontmatter) Reference\n2\t\n3\tProperties use YAML frontmatter at the start of a note:\n4\t\n5\t```yaml\n6\t---\n7\ttitle: My Note Title\n8\tdate: 2024-01-15\n9\ttags:\n10\t - project\n11\t - important\n12\taliases:\n13\t - My Note\n14\t - Alternative Name\n15\tcssclasses:\n16\t - custom-class\n17\tstatus: in-progress\n18\trating: 4.5\n19\tcompleted: false\n20\tdue: 2024-02-01T14:30:00\n21\t---\n22\t```\n23\t\n24\t## Property Types\n25\t\n26\t| Type | Example |\n27\t|------|---------|\n28\t| Text | `title: My Title` |\n29\t| Number | `rating: 4.5` |\n30\t| Checkbox | `completed: true` |\n31\t| Date | `date: 2024-01-15` |\n32\t| Date & Time | `due: 2024-01-15T14:30:00` |\n33\t| List | `tags: [one, two]` or YAML list |\n34\t| Links | `related: \"[[Other Note]]\"` |\n35\t\n36\t## Default Properties\n37\t\n38\t- `tags` - Note tags (searchable, shown in graph view)\n39\t- `aliases` - Alternative names for the note (used in link suggestions)\n40\t- `cssclasses` - CSS classes applied to the note in reading/editing view\n41\t\n42\t## Tags\n43\t\n44\t```markdown\n45\t#tag\n46\t#nested/tag\n47\t#tag-with-dashes\n48\t#tag_with_underscores\n49\t```\n50\t\n51\tTags can contain: letters (any language), numbers (not first character), underscores `_`, hyphens `-`, forward slashes `/` (for nesting).\n52\t\n53\tIn frontmatter:\n54\t\n55\t```yaml\n56\t---\n57\ttags:\n58\t - tag1\n59\t - nested/tag2\n60\t---\n61\t```\n62\t"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "tool_HAtwlDh4WsAVkSnhVGgS1QWR",
|
||
"name": "Grep",
|
||
"input": {
|
||
"pattern": "^---[\\s\\S]*?^---",
|
||
"multiline": true,
|
||
"output_mode": "content",
|
||
"path": "E:\\my-vault\\Dehaze",
|
||
"glob": "*.md",
|
||
"head_limit": 30
|
||
},
|
||
"status": "completed",
|
||
"isExpanded": false,
|
||
"result": "No matches found"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "tool_cAFTg9WZK8rfCDaxzeVTyFlh",
|
||
"name": "Bash",
|
||
"input": {
|
||
"command": "ls -la /e/my-vault/Dehaze/",
|
||
"description": "List Dehaze directory contents"
|
||
},
|
||
"status": "completed",
|
||
"isExpanded": false,
|
||
"result": "total 1928\ndrwxr-xr-x 1 Administrator 197121 0 Apr 14 13:31 .\ndrwxr-xr-x 1 Administrator 197121 0 Apr 22 22:45 ..\n-rw-r--r-- 1 Administrator 197121 3066 Apr 14 13:16 Mineru_api_client-V1.py\n-rw-r--r-- 1 Administrator 197121 4418 Apr 14 13:31 Mineru_api_client-V2.py\n-rw-r--r-- 1 Administrator 197121 1965 Apr 14 12:59 Mineru_api_server-V1.py\n-rw-r--r-- 1 Administrator 197121 2547 Apr 14 13:28 Mineru_api_server-V2.py\ndrwxr-xr-x 1 Administrator 197121 0 Apr 14 13:10 Papers\n-rw-r--r-- 1 Administrator 197121 784 Apr 14 13:22 mineru.service\n-rw-r--r-- 1 Administrator 197121 1940352 Apr 13 17:58 translation-去雾.docx"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "tool_1pPn5MYGgpqFPC4gWvopUVeY",
|
||
"name": "Grep",
|
||
"input": {
|
||
"pattern": "^---[\\s\\S]*?^---",
|
||
"glob": "*.md",
|
||
"multiline": true,
|
||
"output_mode": "content",
|
||
"path": "E:\\my-vault\\Dehaze"
|
||
},
|
||
"status": "completed",
|
||
"isExpanded": false,
|
||
"result": "No matches found"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "tool_cVLhInXXvKG0MabXMeI2sf5t",
|
||
"name": "Grep",
|
||
"input": {
|
||
"pattern": "semantic.?segmentation|computer.?vision|deep.?learning|神经网络|模型架构",
|
||
"path": "E:\\my-vault\\Dehaze",
|
||
"output_mode": "files_with_matches"
|
||
},
|
||
"status": "completed",
|
||
"isExpanded": false,
|
||
"result": "Found 4 files\nDehaze\\Papers\\ORI_MD\\translation-去雾\\translation-去雾_model.json\nDehaze\\Papers\\ORI_MD\\translation-去雾\\translation-去雾_content_list_v2.json\nDehaze\\Papers\\ORI_MD\\translation-去雾\\translation-去雾_content_list.json\nDehaze\\Papers\\ORI_MD\\translation-去雾\\translation-去雾_middle.json"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "tool_MR5ZvLmlGDh1I5vNuzBAG8De",
|
||
"name": "Bash",
|
||
"input": {
|
||
"command": "ls -la /e/my-vault/Dehaze/Papers/",
|
||
"description": "List Dehaze Papers directory"
|
||
},
|
||
"status": "completed",
|
||
"isExpanded": false,
|
||
"result": "total 4\ndrwxr-xr-x 1 Administrator 197121 0 Apr 14 13:10 .\ndrwxr-xr-x 1 Administrator 197121 0 Apr 14 13:31 ..\ndrwxr-xr-x 1 Administrator 197121 0 Apr 14 13:38 ORI_MD\ndrwxr-xr-x 1 Administrator 197121 0 Apr 14 13:38 ORI_PDF"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "tool_e9sgaC9cEw3mIEkgzv6xiD3d",
|
||
"name": "Read",
|
||
"input": {
|
||
"file_path": "E:\\my-vault\\.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\deep-research\\templates\\prisma_protocol_template.md"
|
||
},
|
||
"status": "completed",
|
||
"isExpanded": false,
|
||
"result": "1\t# PRISMA-P 2015 — Systematic Review Protocol Template\n2\t\n3\t## Purpose\n4\t\n5\tTemplate for writing a systematic review protocol following PRISMA-P 2015 (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols). Complete this template before starting the literature search and register it on PROSPERO or OSF.\n6\t\n7\t**Reference**: Shamseer et al. (2015). BMJ, 349, g7647. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7647\n8\t\n9\t---\n10\t\n11\t## ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION\n12\t\n13\t### Title\n14\t\n15\t**[Provide a descriptive title that identifies the report as a protocol for a systematic review. Include \"systematic review\" and \"meta-analysis\" if applicable.]**\n16\t\n17\tRegistration: [PROSPERO / OSF ID, or \"To be registered\"]\n18\t\n19\t### Authors\n20\t\n21\t| # | Name | Affiliation | Role | Contact |\n22\t|---|------|-------------|------|---------|\n23\t| 1 | [Name] | [Institution] | Guarantor / Lead | [email] |\n24\t| 2 | [Name] | [Institution] | Co-reviewer | [email] |\n25\t\n26\t### Amendments\n27\t\n28\t| Date | Section Changed | Description of Change | Rationale |\n29\t|------|----------------|----------------------|-----------|\n30\t| [date] | [section] | [change] | [why] |\n31\t\n32\t### Support\n33\t\n34\t**Sources**: [Funding source(s) or \"No external funding\"]\n35\t**Role of funder**: [Describe any role of funders in the review, or \"None\"]\n36\t\n37\t---\n38\t\n39\t## INTRODUCTION\n40\t\n41\t### Rationale\n42\t\n43\t**[Describe the rationale for the review in the context of what is already known. Explain why this review is needed.]**\n44\t\n45\tKey points to address:\n46\t- What is the health/education/social problem?\n47\t- What is the current state of the evidence?\n48\t- Why is a systematic review needed now? (e.g., existing reviews are outdated, conflicting evidence, no previous review exists)\n49\t\n50\t### Objectives\n51\t\n52\t**[Provide an explicit statement of the question(s) the review will address. Use the PICOS framework.]**\n53\t\n54\t- **P** (Population): [Define the target population]\n55\t- **I** (Intervention/Exposure): [Define the intervention or exposure of interest]\n56\t- **C** (Comparator): [Define the comparison group]\n57\t- **O** (Outcomes): [Define primary and secondary outcomes]\n58\t- **S** (Study design): [Specify eligible study designs]\n59\t\n60\tResearch Question: [State the review question in a single sentence]\n61\t\n62\t---\n63\t\n64\t## METHODS\n65\t\n66\t### Eligibility Criteria\n67\t\n68\t#### Study Characteristics\n69\t\n70\t| Criterion | Include | Exclude |\n71\t|-----------|---------|---------|\n72\t| **Study design** | [e.g., RCTs, quasi-experimental, cohort] | [e.g., case reports, editorials, commentaries] |\n73\t| **Publication date** | [e.g., 2010-present] | [Before cutoff, with justification] |\n74\t| **Language** | [e.g., English and Chinese] | [Other languages, with justification] |\n75\t| **Publication status** | [e.g., published and preprints] | [e.g., conference abstracts only] |\n76\t| **Setting** | [e.g., higher education institutions] | [e.g., K-12, non-formal education] |\n77\t\n78\t#### Participants\n79\t\n80\t[Describe the target population in detail. Include age, gender, condition, or other relevant characteristics.]\n81\t\n82\t#### Interventions/Exposures\n83\t\n84\t[Describe the intervention(s) or exposure(s) of interest. Include dosage, frequency, duration if applicable.]\n85\t\n86\t#### Comparators\n87\t\n88\t[Describe the comparator(s). This may include no intervention, usual care, placebo, or alternative interventions.]\n89\t\n90\t#### Outcomes\n91\t\n92\t**Primary outcome(s)**:\n93\t1. [Outcome 1] — measured by [instrument/method], at [time point(s)]\n94\t2. [Outcome 2] — measured by [instrument/method], at [time point(s)]\n95\t\n96\t**Secondary outcome(s)**:\n97\t1. [Outcome 3] — measured by [instrument/method], at [time point(s)]\n98\t2. [Outcome 4] — measured by [instrument/method], at [time point(s)]\n99\t\n100\t#### Timing\n101\t\n102\t[Specify any minimum follow-up duration or time constraints]\n103\t\n104\t### Information Sources\n105\t\n106\t| Database/Source | URL | Coverage | Justification |\n107\t|----------------|-----|----------|---------------|\n108\t| [e.g., PubMed/MEDLINE] | pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov | Biomedical | Core database for health research |\n109\t| [e.g., Web of Science] | webofscience.com | Multidisciplinary | Citation indexing, broad coverage |\n110\t| [e.g., Scopus] | scopus.com | Multidisciplinary | Large abstract database |\n111\t| [e.g., ERIC] | eric.ed.gov | Education | Core database for education research |\n112\t| [e.g., PsycINFO] | apa.org/pubs/databases/psycinfo | Psychology | Behavioral science coverage |\n113\t| [Grey literature] | [specify sources] | — | Reduce publication bias |\n114\t| [Trial registries] | clinicaltrials.gov, WHO ICTRP | — | Identify unpublished studies |\n115\t\n116\tAdditional sources:\n117\t- Reference lists of included studies (backward citation)\n118\t- Citation tracking of key studies (forward citation)\n119\t- Contact with experts in the field (if applicable)\n120\t\n121\t### Search Strategy\n122\t\n123\t**[Present the draft search strategy for at least one database. The strategy should be peer-reviewed using the PRESS checklist.]**\n124\t\n125\tExample structure for [primary database]:\n126\t```\n127\tSearch Block 1 (Population):\n128\t \"higher education\" OR \"university\" OR \"college\" OR \"postsecondary\"\n129\t\n130\tSearch Block 2 (Intervention/Exposure):\n131\t \"quality assurance\" OR \"accreditation\" OR \"program review\"\n132\t\n133\tSearch Block 3 (Outcome):\n134\t \"student outcomes\" OR \"learning outcomes\" OR \"graduation rate\"\n135\t\n136\tCombined: Block 1 AND Block 2 AND Block 3\n137\tFilters: [date range], [language], [document type]\n138\t```\n139\t\n140\t### Study Records\n141\t\n142\t#### Data Management\n143\t\n144\t[Describe the software/tools to be used for managing records. E.g., Covidence, Rayyan, Excel, Zotero]\n145\t\n146\t#### Selection Process\n147\t\n148\t1. **Deduplication**: [Method for removing duplicates, e.g., automatic in Covidence + manual check]\n149\t2. **Title/Abstract screening**: [Number of reviewers, independence, process for resolving disagreements]\n150\t3. **Full-text screening**: [Number of reviewers, independence, process for resolving disagreements]\n151\t4. **Documentation**: [How excluded studies and reasons will be recorded]\n152\t\n153\tPilot: [Describe pilot testing of screening criteria, e.g., \"Two reviewers will independently screen 50 records to calibrate criteria before full screening\"]\n154\t\n155\t#### Data Collection Process\n156\t\n157\t1. **Data extraction form**: [Describe or attach the form. Pilot test with 3-5 studies]\n158\t2. **Extractors**: [Number, independence, process for resolving discrepancies]\n159\t3. **Missing data**: [How missing or unclear data will be handled, e.g., contact authors]\n160\t\n161\t### Data Items\n162\t\n163\t| Category | Variables to Extract |\n164\t|----------|---------------------|\n165\t| **Study metadata** | Authors, year, country, journal, study design |\n166\t| **Participants** | Sample size, demographics, setting, inclusion criteria |\n167\t| **Intervention/Exposure** | Description, duration, frequency, comparison group |\n168\t| **Outcomes** | Primary and secondary outcomes, measurement tools, time points |\n169\t| **Results** | Effect sizes, CIs, p-values, means, SDs, counts |\n170\t| **Quality** | Funding, COI declarations, registration status |\n171\t\n172\t### Risk of Bias Assessment\n173\t\n174\t**Tool**: [Specify the tool]\n175\t- RCTs: RoB 2 (Sterne et al., 2019)\n176\t- Non-randomized studies: ROBINS-I (Sterne et al., 2016)\n177\t- Qualitative studies: [e.g., CASP qualitative checklist]\n178\t\n179\t**Process**: [Number of assessors, independence, consensus process]\n180\t\n181\t**Use in synthesis**: [How risk of bias results will inform the synthesis, e.g., sensitivity analysis excluding high-risk studies]\n182\t\n183\t### Data Synthesis\n184\t\n185\t#### Quantitative Synthesis (Meta-Analysis)\n186\t\n187\t**Conditions for meta-analysis**: [Describe when studies will be pooled, e.g., \"When ≥ 3 studies report sufficiently similar outcomes measured in comparable populations\"]\n188\t\n189\t**Effect measure**: [Specify, e.g., SMD for continuous outcomes, RR for binary outcomes]\n190\t\n191\t**Model**: [Fixed-effect / Random-effects, with justification]\n192\t\n193\t**Heterogeneity assessment**:\n194\t- Q-test (significance at p < 0.10)\n195\t- I² statistic with 95% CI\n196\t- tau² (between-study variance)\n197\t- Prediction interval\n198\t\n199\t**Subgroup analyses** (pre-specified):\n200\t1. [Subgroup variable 1] — Rationale: [why]\n201\t2. [Subgroup variable 2] — Rationale: [why]\n202\t\n203\t**Sensitivity analyses**:\n204\t1. Leave-one-out analysis\n205\t2. Exclude high risk of bias studies\n206\t3. [Other planned sensitivity analyses]\n207\t\n208\t**Software**: [Specify, e.g., R metafor package, RevMan]\n209\t\n210\t#### Narrative Synthesis\n211\t\n212\t**When meta-analysis is not feasible**: [Describe the narrative synthesis approach, e.g., SWiM reporting guideline, vote counting, effect direction plot]\n213\t\n214\t### Meta-Bias Assessment\n215\t\n216\t**Publication bias**: [Methods to assess, e.g., funnel plot + Egger's test if ≥ 10 studies]\n217\t\n218\t**Selective reporting**: [How to detect, e.g., compare protocol to published report, search trial registries]\n219\t\n220\t### Confidence in Cumulative Evidence\n221\t\n222\t**Framework**: GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations)\n223\t\n224\t[Describe how GRADE will be applied to assess certainty for each outcome]\n225\t\n226\t---\n227\t\n228\t## APPENDICES\n229\t\n230\t### Appendix A: Draft Search Strategy\n231\t\n232\t[Complete search strategy for the primary database]\n233\t\n234\t### Appendix B: Data Extraction Form\n235\t\n236\t[Include or reference the data extraction form]\n237\t\n238\t### Appendix C: PRISMA-P Checklist\n239\t\n240\t[Mark each PRISMA-P item as addressed with the relevant page/section number]\n241\t\n242\t---\n243\t\n244\t## Revision Log\n245\t\n246\t| Version | Date | Author | Changes |\n247\t|---------|------|--------|---------|\n248\t| 1.0 | [date] | [name] | Initial protocol |\n249\t"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "tool_AsBhLFrL9Ix6lrpRo0hAl7dj",
|
||
"name": "Read",
|
||
"input": {
|
||
"file_path": "E:\\my-vault\\.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\tutor-setup\\references\\codebase-templates.md"
|
||
},
|
||
"status": "completed",
|
||
"isExpanded": false,
|
||
"result": "1\t# Codebase Mode — Templates Reference\n2\t\n3\t## Vault Folder Structure\n4\t\n5\t```\n6\tStudyVault/\n7\t 00-Dashboard/ # MOC + Quick Reference + Getting Started\n8\t 01-Architecture/ # System overview, request flow, data flow\n9\t 02-<Module1>/ # Per-module notes\n10\t 03-<Module2>/\n11\t ...\n12\t NN-DevOps/ # Build, deploy, CI/CD, env config\n13\t NN+1-Exercises/ # Onboarding exercises\n14\t```\n15\t\n16\t## Dashboard MOC Template\n17\t\n18\t```markdown\n19\t---\n20\tmodule: dashboard\n21\tpath: 00-Dashboard\n22\tkeywords: MOC, onboarding, architecture, <project-name>\n23\t---\n24\t\n25\t# <Project Name> — Onboarding Map\n26\t\n27\t#dashboard #onboarding\n28\t\n29\t## Architecture Overview\n30\t- Pattern: <architectural pattern>\n31\t- Tech stack: <languages, frameworks, key libraries>\n32\t- → [[System Architecture]]\n33\t- → [[Request Flow]]\n34\t\n35\t## Module Map\n36\t| Module | Purpose | Key Entry Point | Notes |\n37\t|--------|---------|-----------------|-------|\n38\t| <name> | <1-line purpose> | `<path>` | [[Module Note]] |\n39\t\n40\t## API Surface\n41\t| Method | Path / Command | Module | Notes |\n42\t|--------|---------------|--------|-------|\n43\t| GET | `/endpoint` | <module> | [[API Note]] |\n44\t\n45\t## Getting Started\n46\t1. Prerequisites: ...\n47\t2. Install: `<install command>`\n48\t3. Configure: copy `.env.example` → `.env`\n49\t4. Run: `<run command>`\n50\t5. Test: `<test command>`\n51\t\n52\t## Tag Index\n53\t| Tag | Description | Rule |\n54\t|-----|-------------|------|\n55\t| `#arch-*` | Architecture concepts | Top-level pattern tags |\n56\t| `#module-*` | Module-specific | One per module |\n57\t\n58\t## Onboarding Path\n59\t> Recommended reading order for new developers:\n60\t\n61\t1. [[System Architecture]] — big picture\n62\t2. [[Request Flow]] — how a request moves through the system\n63\t3. [[Module A]] → [[Module B]] → ... — module deep dives\n64\t4. [[Exercises]] — hands-on practice\n65\t```\n66\t\n67\t## Quick Reference Template\n68\t\n69\t```markdown\n70\t---\n71\tmodule: dashboard\n72\tpath: 00-Dashboard\n73\tkeywords: quick-reference, commands, setup\n74\t---\n75\t\n76\t# Quick Reference\n77\t\n78\t#dashboard #quick-reference\n79\t\n80\t## Key Commands\n81\t| Action | Command |\n82\t|--------|---------|\n83\t| Install deps | `<command>` |\n84\t| Run dev | `<command>` |\n85\t| Run tests | `<command>` |\n86\t| Build | `<command>` |\n87\t| Lint | `<command>` |\n88\t\n89\t## Environment Setup\n90\t1. ...\n91\t\n92\t## Important File Locations\n93\t| File / Dir | Purpose |\n94\t|------------|---------|\n95\t| `<path>` | <description> |\n96\t\n97\t## Common Debugging\n98\t| Symptom | Where to Look | → Note |\n99\t|---------|---------------|--------|\n100\t| <problem> | `<file/log>` | [[Module Note]] |\n101\t```\n102\t\n103\t## Module Note Template\n104\t\n105\t```markdown\n106\t---\n107\tmodule: <module-name>\n108\tpath: <relative-path-from-project-root>\n109\tkeywords: <3-5 English keywords>\n110\t---\n111\t\n112\t# <Module Name> (<Importance: ★~★★★>)\n113\t\n114\t#module-<name> #<pattern-tag>\n115\t\n116\t## Purpose\n117\t<1-3 sentences: what this module does and why it exists>\n118\t\n119\t## Key Files\n120\t| File | Role |\n121\t|------|------|\n122\t| `<relative-path>` | <description> |\n123\t\n124\t## Public Interface\n125\t| Export | Type | Description |\n126\t|--------|------|-------------|\n127\t| `<name>` | function/class/endpoint | <what it does> |\n128\t\n129\t## Internal Flow\n130\t\n131\t```text\n132\t<ASCII diagram showing data/control flow within this module>\n133\t```\n134\t\n135\t## Dependencies\n136\t| Direction | Module / Service | Via |\n137\t|-----------|-----------------|-----|\n138\t| **Uses** | <dependency> | `<import/call>` |\n139\t| **Used by** | <dependent> | `<import/call>` |\n140\t\n141\t## Configuration\n142\t| Env Var / Config Key | Purpose | Default |\n143\t|---------------------|---------|---------|\n144\t| `<VAR>` | <description> | `<default>` |\n145\t\n146\t## Testing\n147\t- Run: `<test command for this module>`\n148\t- Pattern: <unit/integration/e2e>\n149\t- Coverage notes: ...\n150\t\n151\t## Related Notes\n152\t- [[Other Module]]\n153\t- [[Architecture Note]]\n154\t```\n155\t\n156\t## API Note Template\n157\t\n158\t```markdown\n159\t---\n160\tmodule: <module-name>\n161\tpath: <relative-path>\n162\tkeywords: API, <endpoint-keywords>\n163\t---\n164\t\n165\t# <Endpoint Group> API\n166\t\n167\t#api-<group> #module-<name>\n168\t\n169\t## Endpoints\n170\t| Method | Path | Auth | Description |\n171\t|--------|------|------|-------------|\n172\t| GET | `/path` | required | <description> |\n173\t\n174\t## Request / Response\n175\t\n176\t### <Endpoint Name>\n177\t\n178\t**Request**:\n179\t```json\n180\t{\n181\t \"field\": \"type — description\"\n182\t}\n183\t```\n184\t\n185\t**Response (success)**:\n186\t```json\n187\t{\n188\t \"field\": \"type — description\"\n189\t}\n190\t```\n191\t\n192\t**Error cases**:\n193\t| Status | Condition | Response |\n194\t|--------|-----------|----------|\n195\t| 400 | <condition> | `{ \"error\": \"...\" }` |\n196\t\n197\t## Related Notes\n198\t- [[Module Note]]\n199\t- [[Other API Note]]\n200\t```\n201\t\n202\t## Onboarding Exercise Template\n203\t\n204\t```markdown\n205\t---\n206\tmodule: exercises\n207\tpath: <NN+1>-Exercises\n208\tkeywords: practice, onboarding, <topic>\n209\t---\n210\t\n211\t# <Topic> — Onboarding Exercises\n212\t\n213\t#practice #onboarding #module-<name>\n214\t\n215\t## Related Modules\n216\t- [[Module Note 1]]\n217\t- [[Module Note 2]]\n218\t\n219\t---\n220\t\n221\t## Exercise 1 — Code Reading [trace]\n222\t> Trace what happens when <specific trigger>. List the files and functions involved in order.\n223\t\n224\t> [!answer]- View Answer\n225\t> 1. `<file>` → `<function>` — <what happens>\n226\t> 2. `<file>` → `<function>` — <what happens>\n227\t> 3. ...\n228\t\n229\t---\n230\t\n231\t## Exercise 2 — Configuration [config]\n232\t> How would you change <specific setting>? Which files need modification?\n233\t\n234\t> [!answer]- View Answer\n235\t> - File: `<path>`\n236\t> - Change: <description>\n237\t> - Related env var: `<VAR>`\n238\t\n239\t---\n240\t\n241\t## Exercise 3 — Debugging [debug]\n242\t> If <symptom> occurs, where would you look first? Describe your investigation steps.\n243\t\n244\t> [!answer]- View Answer\n245\t> 1. Check `<file/log>` for ...\n246\t> 2. Verify `<config>` is ...\n247\t> 3. Common cause: ...\n248\t\n249\t---\n250\t\n251\t## Exercise 4 — Extension [extend]\n252\t> How would you add <new feature/endpoint>? Describe the files you'd create or modify.\n253\t\n254\t> [!answer]- View Answer\n255\t> 1. Create `<path>` — <purpose>\n256\t> 2. Modify `<path>` — <what to add>\n257\t> 3. Add test in `<path>` — <what to test>\n258\t> 4. Register in `<path>` — <wiring>\n259\t\n260\t---\n261\t\n262\t> [!summary]- 학습 포인트 요약\n263\t> | Topic | Key Takeaway |\n264\t> |-------|-------------|\n265\t> | <topic> | <insight> |\n266\t```\n267\t\n268\t## Formatting Rules\n269\t\n270\t- `[[wiki-links]]` for all cross-references\n271\t- `> [!tip]`, `> [!important]`, `> [!warning]` callouts for key information\n272\t- ASCII diagrams for flows, architecture, and module interactions\n273\t- Tables over prose for structured information\n274\t- **Bold** for critical terms and file paths in descriptions\n275\t- Code blocks with language hints for commands and snippets\n276\t- **Localization**: Fold callout labels (e.g., `View Answer`) should match team language. Korean: `정답 보기`, English: `View Answer`\n277\t"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "tool_cscRadeXSCjIi61IhGzdYX9I",
|
||
"name": "Bash",
|
||
"input": {
|
||
"command": "ls -la /e/my-vault/Dehaze/Papers/ORI_MD/translation-去雾/",
|
||
"description": "List dehaze translation files"
|
||
},
|
||
"status": "completed",
|
||
"isExpanded": false,
|
||
"result": "total 6352\ndrwxr-xr-x 1 Administrator 197121 0 Apr 14 13:31 .\ndrwxr-xr-x 1 Administrator 197121 0 Apr 14 13:38 ..\ndrwxr-xr-x 1 Administrator 197121 0 Apr 14 13:31 images\n-rw-r--r-- 1 Administrator 197121 48545 Apr 14 13:31 translation-去雾.md\n-rw-r--r-- 1 Administrator 197121 88112 Apr 14 13:31 translation-去雾_content_list.json\n-rw-r--r-- 1 Administrator 197121 136731 Apr 14 13:31 translation-去雾_content_list_v2.json\n-rw-r--r-- 1 Administrator 197121 3191979 Apr 14 13:31 translation-去雾_layout.pdf\n-rw-r--r-- 1 Administrator 197121 645458 Apr 14 13:31 translation-去雾_middle.json\n-rw-r--r-- 1 Administrator 197121 184948 Apr 14 13:31 translation-去雾_model.json\n-rw-r--r-- 1 Administrator 197121 2139051 Apr 14 13:31 translation-去雾_origin.pdf"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "tool_dPqxSXLueJ7b3nedh3q7Fo0U",
|
||
"name": "Grep",
|
||
"input": {
|
||
"pattern": "^---[\\s\\S]*?^---",
|
||
"glob": "*.md",
|
||
"multiline": true,
|
||
"output_mode": "content",
|
||
"path": "E:\\my-vault\\Excalidraw",
|
||
"head_limit": 50
|
||
},
|
||
"status": "completed",
|
||
"isExpanded": false,
|
||
"result": "E:\\my-vault\\Excalidraw\\Drawing 2026-04-22 22.49.50.excalidraw.md:1:---\nE:\\my-vault\\Excalidraw\\Drawing 2026-04-22 22.49.50.excalidraw.md:2:\nE:\\my-vault\\Excalidraw\\Drawing 2026-04-22 22.49.50.excalidraw.md:3:excalidraw-plugin: parsed\nE:\\my-vault\\Excalidraw\\Drawing 2026-04-22 22.49.50.excalidraw.md:4:tags: [excalidraw]\nE:\\my-vault\\Excalidraw\\Drawing 2026-04-22 22.49.50.excalidraw.md:5:\nE:\\my-vault\\Excalidraw\\Drawing 2026-04-22 22.49.50.excalidraw.md:6:---\nE:\\my-vault\\Excalidraw\\Drawing 2026-04-22 22.49.48.excalidraw.md:1:---\nE:\\my-vault\\Excalidraw\\Drawing 2026-04-22 22.49.48.excalidraw.md:2:\nE:\\my-vault\\Excalidraw\\Drawing 2026-04-22 22.49.48.excalidraw.md:3:excalidraw-plugin: parsed\nE:\\my-vault\\Excalidraw\\Drawing 2026-04-22 22.49.48.excalidraw.md:4:tags: [excalidraw]\nE:\\my-vault\\Excalidraw\\Drawing 2026-04-22 22.49.48.excalidraw.md:5:\nE:\\my-vault\\Excalidraw\\Drawing 2026-04-22 22.49.48.excalidraw.md:6:---\nE:\\my-vault\\Excalidraw\\Drawing 2026-04-22 22.40.08.excalidraw.md:1:---\nE:\\my-vault\\Excalidraw\\Drawing 2026-04-22 22.40.08.excalidraw.md:2:\nE:\\my-vault\\Excalidraw\\Drawing 2026-04-22 22.40.08.excalidraw.md:3:excalidraw-plugin: parsed\nE:\\my-vault\\Excalidraw\\Drawing 2026-04-22 22.40.08.excalidraw.md:4:tags: [excalidraw]\nE:\\my-vault\\Excalidraw\\Drawing 2026-04-22 22.40.08.excalidraw.md:5:\nE:\\my-vault\\Excalidraw\\Drawing 2026-04-22 22.40.08.excalidraw.md:6:---"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "tool_XmzjzSEDqTW9BfQr63ZaenJP",
|
||
"name": "Grep",
|
||
"input": {
|
||
"pattern": "^---[\\s\\S]*?^---",
|
||
"glob": "*.md",
|
||
"multiline": true,
|
||
"output_mode": "content",
|
||
"path": "E:\\my-vault\\copilot",
|
||
"head_limit": 50
|
||
},
|
||
"status": "completed",
|
||
"isExpanded": false,
|
||
"result": "E:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Translate to Chinese.md:1:---\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Translate to Chinese.md:2:copilot-command-context-menu-enabled: true\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Translate to Chinese.md:3:copilot-command-slash-enabled: true\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Translate to Chinese.md:4:copilot-command-context-menu-order: 1010\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Translate to Chinese.md:5:copilot-command-model-key: \"\"\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Translate to Chinese.md:6:copilot-command-last-used: 0\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Translate to Chinese.md:7:---\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Summarize.md:1:---\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Summarize.md:2:copilot-command-context-menu-enabled: true\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Summarize.md:3:copilot-command-slash-enabled: true\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Summarize.md:4:copilot-command-context-menu-order: 1020\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Summarize.md:5:copilot-command-model-key: \"\"\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Summarize.md:6:copilot-command-last-used: 0\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Summarize.md:7:---\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Simplify.md:1:---\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Simplify.md:2:copilot-command-context-menu-enabled: true\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Simplify.md:3:copilot-command-slash-enabled: true\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Simplify.md:4:copilot-command-context-menu-order: 1030\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Simplify.md:5:copilot-command-model-key: \"\"\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Simplify.md:6:copilot-command-last-used: 0\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Simplify.md:7:---\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Rewrite as tweet.md:1:---\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Rewrite as tweet.md:2:copilot-command-context-menu-enabled: false\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Rewrite as tweet.md:3:copilot-command-slash-enabled: false\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Rewrite as tweet.md:4:copilot-command-context-menu-order: 1110\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Rewrite as tweet.md:5:copilot-command-model-key: \"\"\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Rewrite as tweet.md:6:copilot-command-last-used: 0\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Rewrite as tweet.md:7:---\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Fix grammar and spelling.md:1:---\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Fix grammar and spelling.md:2:copilot-command-context-menu-enabled: true\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Fix grammar and spelling.md:3:copilot-command-slash-enabled: true\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Fix grammar and spelling.md:4:copilot-command-context-menu-order: 1000\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Fix grammar and spelling.md:5:copilot-command-model-key: \"\"\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Fix grammar and spelling.md:6:copilot-command-last-used: 0\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Fix grammar and spelling.md:7:---\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Explain like I am 5.md:1:---\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Explain like I am 5.md:2:copilot-command-context-menu-enabled: true\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Explain like I am 5.md:3:copilot-command-slash-enabled: true\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Explain like I am 5.md:4:copilot-command-context-menu-order: 1040\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Explain like I am 5.md:5:copilot-command-model-key: \"\"\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Explain like I am 5.md:6:copilot-command-last-used: 0\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Explain like I am 5.md:7:---\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Generate glossary.md:1:---\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Generate glossary.md:2:copilot-command-context-menu-enabled: false\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Generate glossary.md:3:copilot-command-slash-enabled: false\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Generate glossary.md:4:copilot-command-context-menu-order: 1090\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Generate glossary.md:5:copilot-command-model-key: \"\"\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Generate glossary.md:6:copilot-command-last-used: 0\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Generate glossary.md:7:---\nE:\\my-vault\\copilot\\copilot-custom-prompts\\Remove URLs.md:1:---\n\n[Showing results with pagination = limit: 50]"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "tool_KPx75X6Ot4Msun8kZgdFUz1l",
|
||
"name": "Read",
|
||
"input": {
|
||
"file_path": "E:\\my-vault\\Dehaze\\Papers\\ORI_MD\\translation-去雾\\translation-去雾.md",
|
||
"limit": 100
|
||
},
|
||
"status": "completed",
|
||
"isExpanded": false,
|
||
"result": "1\t# 1 Introduction\n2\t\n3\tIn laparoscopic surgery, high-frequency electroknife, ultrasound knife and other energy instruments are widely used for tissue cutting, coagulation and separation. The moment these devices come into contact with biological tissues, they convert electrical or mechanical energy into heat, causing the intracellular fluid to boil, vaporize, and then burst, releasing a mixed aerosol containing water vapor, cell debris, carbonized particles and harmful chemicals, known as \"surgical smoke\". while the relatively closed and humid environment in the abdominal cavity (relative humidity is often close to 100%)The temperature difference between the lens and the endoscope lens can easily lead to condensation on the lens surface to form water mist. This visual degradation, which is composed of surgical fumes and lens water mist, is highly dynamic and complex. It not only reduces the contrast and clarity of the image and obscures key anatomical structures such as blood vessels and bile ducts in the gallbladder triangle, but can also lead to color distortion and affect doctors' judgment of tissue activity. In severe cases, the field of view is completely obstructed, and doctors are forced to interrupt the operation, repeatedly pulling out the lens for wiping or waiting for the smoke to dissipate. According to statistics, this not only significantly prolongs the operation time and increases the risk of anesthesia, but can also lead to serious complications such as vascular or organ damage due to blind operation.\n4\t\n5\tAt present, clinical practice mainly relies on physical means to remove smoke, including passive smoke extraction by opening the valve on the trocar, or using an active smoking device with a special smoking pipe or electric knife with smoking function, or Preoperative lens anti-fog treatment with iodophor or anti-fog oil to wipe the lens preoperatively. However, these methods often have problems such as manual operation by doctors and short effective time for defogging. In view of the limitations of physical means, computer vision-based image dehazing technology (Dehazing) came into being. Through algorithm post-processing, clear fog-free images are restored from degraded foggy images in real time, so as to achieve \"virtual smoke\n6\t\n7\texhaust\". This can not only ensure a clear field of view, but also avoid the interference of physical smoke exhaust on pneumoperitoneal pressure, which is an important research direction of smart medicine and computer-aided surgery (CAS).\n8\t\n9\tHowever, in the face of drastic changes from trace fog to heavy scorched smoke, the network model with a single weight is often difficult to take into account all scenarios: it is easy to over-dehaze in light fog and cause color distortion, while under heavy fog, residual noise may remain. To this end, an adaptive dehazing network (Yun-Trans) based on dynamic Mixture of Experts (MoE) is further designed. The network introduces \"fog concentration perception\" and \"dynamic weight generation\" mechanisms, aiming to achieve accurate matching and adaptive processing of different surgical smoke scenarios.\n10\t\n11\t# 2 Method\n12\t\n13\t# 2.1 Construction of laparoscopic fog image model\n14\t\n15\t# 2.1.1 Microscopic physical properties and scattering theory of laparoscopic aerosols\n16\t\n17\tLaparoscopic surgery is performed in a relatively enclosed, tiny space filled with carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum, an environment with significant optical features that render the standard ASM model ineffective. Therefore, we cannot simply follow the standard formula $I = J t + A ( 1 - t )$ , but need to build a new model that includes the light source geometry factor and the bipass transmission mechanism.\n18\t\n19\tTo quantify the interaction between light and surgical fumes, the microphysical properties of suspended particles were first analyzed. Surgical fume is a complex multi-dispersion aerosol system, which mainly includes smoke generated by high-frequency electric knife and ultrasound knife and condensate produced by lens condensation on the surface, and its optical scattering behavior is described by Mie Theory.\n20\t\n21\t \n22\tFig.1 Schematic diagram of laparoscopic surgery mist scattering model\n23\t\n24\tFor single spherical particles such as electrocutor smoke and ultrasonic knife water mist, their scattering behavior is determined by the scattering cross-section $\\sigma _ { s c a }$ and the scattering phase function ?(?) . Electric knife smoke follows the Rayleigh scattering region, i.e., when the radius of the particles is much smaller than the wavelength of light ( ? ≪ ? ), the scattered light intensity $I _ { s c a }$ is inversely proportional to the fourth power of the wavelength:\n25\t\n26\t$$\n27\tI _ {s c a} (\\theta) \\propto \\frac {1}{\\lambda^ {4}} (1 + \\cos^ {2} \\theta)\n28\t$$\n29\t\n30\tThis means that blue light (short wavelengths) is scattered the most strongly, while red light (long wavelengths) is the most penetrating. This explains why the red tissue (blood vessels, muscles) in the abdominal cavity tends to be clearer than the blue object (some instrument markings) in the smoke produced by the electroknife. For the dehaze model, it means that transmittance ?(?) is a function of wavelength ? , $t ( x , \\lambda ) = e ^ { - \\beta ( \\lambda ) d ( x ) }$ .\n31\t\n32\tIn the Mie scattering region formed by ultrasonic knife water mist, when the radius of particles is close to or greater than the wavelength of light, the dependence of the scattering cross-section $\\sigma _ { s c a }$ on the wavelength is weakened, which is approximately constant. At this point, all colors of light are scattered in equal amounts, causing the smoke to appear white. Mie scattering has strong forward scattering characteristics, that is, most of the light is scattered forward, but for coaxial\n33\t\n34\tillumination imaging systems, we pay more attention to backscattering $( \\theta \\approx 1 8 0 ^ { \\circ } )$ , which directly enters the lens to form a light curtain.\n35\t\n36\tIn actual surgery, the medium in the pneumoperitoneum is often a mixture of the above particles. Assuming that the number density of the class ? particles is $N _ { i }$ , the scattering cross-section is $\\sigma _ { s c a , i }$ , and the absorption cross-section is $\\sigma _ { a b s , i }$ , then the total extinction coefficient $\\beta _ { e x t }$ of the medium is:\n37\t\n38\t$$\n39\t\\beta_ {e x t} (\\lambda , x) = \\sum_ {i} N _ {i} (x) \\cdot (\\sigma_ {s c a, i} (\\lambda) + \\sigma_ {a b s, i} (\\lambda))\n40\t$$\n41\t\n42\tSince intra-abdominal smoke is mainly scattered, the absorption is usually negligible (unless there is a large amount of carbonized black smoke), so the extinction coefficient is roughly considered to be equal to the scattering coefficient $\\beta _ { s c a }$ . It should be pointed out that due to the dynamic nature of the surgical operation, $N _ { i } ( x )$ it is a function of time ? and spatial position ? . This is the physical motivation for the urgent need to introduce a \"dynamic expert mechanism\" for laparoscopic dehazing algorithms: the network needs to dynamically infer whether the medium is dominant Rayleigh scattering (wavelength compensation) or Mie scattering (contrast enhancement) based on the current image characteristics, so as to call different weight parameters.\n43\t\n44\t# 2.1.2 Mathematical derivation of laparoscopic enhanced imaging model\n45\t\n46\tBased on the physical analysis described above, we will derive a complete mathematical model describing the laparoscopic imaging process. The model consists of two parts: the Direct Attenuation Term and the Backscatter/Airlight Term.\n47\t\n48\t# A. Light source irradiance model\n49\t\n50\tSuppose the endoscopic light source is a point light source located at the origin $( 0 , 0 , 0 )$ , and its luminous intensity angular distribution is $I _ { s r c } ( \\theta )$ (usually approximate to the Lambertian source or Gaussian distribution). Light travels through a space filled with scattering media. For any point ? in space, the distance from the light source is ? , and the angle between the light direction and the optical axis is $\\phi$ . The irradiance ?(?) of the arrival point ? is affected by two factors: Geometric Spreading: the energy decays with the square of the distance, $\\propto 1 / r ^ { 2 }$ .\n51\t\n52\tMedium Extinction: Energy decays with the path exponential,according to the Beer-Lambert Law. Therefore, the incident irradiance at the point ? is:\n53\t\n54\t$$\n55\tE _ {i n} (P) = \\frac {I _ {s r c} (\\phi)}{r ^ {2}} e ^ {- \\int_ {0} ^ {r} \\beta_ {e x t} (s) d s}\n56\t$$\n57\t\n58\tTo simplify the model for easy calculation, assuming that the medium is locally uniform in the optical path (with a coefficient of ? ), then:\n59\t\n60\t$$\n61\tE _ {i n} (P) = \\frac {I _ {s r c} (\\phi)}{r ^ {2}} e ^ {- \\beta r}\n62\t$$\n63\t\n64\t# B. Direct signal attenuation term ? ?\n65\t\n66\tThis is the signal light that we want to recover to carry tissue information. When light hits the surface of the tissue (at a position $\\mathrm { P _ { o b j } }$ , at a distance ?(?) from the lens), the tissue is reflected. Let the surface reflectance of the tissue be ${ \\bf \\Xi } ( { \\bf \\Lambda } \\rho ( x )$ , the core component of the potentially clear image ?(?) ). The reflected light returns to the camera from the surface of the tissue, again passing through the distance $d ( x )$ of the medium attenuation. Therefore, the intensity of direct reflected light ?(?) received by the camera sensor at the pixel ? is:\n67\t\n68\t$$\n69\tD (x) = \\left(\\frac {I _ {0}}{d (x) ^ {2}} e ^ {- \\beta d (x)}\\right) \\cdot \\rho (x) \\cdot e ^ {- \\beta d (x)}\n70\t$$\n71\t\n72\twhere $\\left( \\frac { I _ { 0 } } { d ( x ) ^ { 2 } } e ^ { - \\beta d ( x ) } \\right)$ is the incident illuminance, $\\rho ( x )$ surface reflectance, and $e ^ { - \\beta d ( x ) }$ return path attenuation. After merging the same terms, we obtain a two-way attenuation model unique to laparoscopy:\n73\t\n74\t$$\n75\tD (x) = \\frac {I _ {0} \\rho (x)}{d (x) ^ {2}} e ^ {- 2 \\beta d (x)}\n76\t$$\n77\t\n78\tThe signal term in the standard atmospheric scattering model is $J ( x ) e ^ { - \\beta d ( x ) }$ . In contrast, the laparoscopic model has one e more factor (two-way attenuation) and a geometric factor $1 / d ( x ) ^ { 2 }$ . This shows that with the increase of depth $d ( x )$ , the signal intensity of laparoscopic images decays much faster than that of outdoor haze images. The deep tissue is not only obscured by smoke, but also extremely dark due to insufficient light.\n79\t\n80\tThis explains the current common phenomenon in surgery: under heavy smoke, doctors often do not see deep structures (such as the gallbladder triangle) at all, which\n81\t\n82\tis not only a problem of reduced contrast, but also a sharp deterioration of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).\n83\t\n84\t# C. Integral derivation of the backscattered light curtain term ?(?)\n85\t\n86\tThis is the main cause of the image \"whitening\" and \"fogging\", corresponding to the atmospheric light term ?(1 − ?) in the Standard Model. In laparoscopy, the light volume highly coincides with the observation cone due to the coaxial light source with the camera, which results in extremely severe backscattering.\n87\t\n88\tConsider the line of sight that emanates from the camera center and passes through the pixels ?. In this line of sight, smoke particles within every microparticle volume ?? from distance ? = 0 to $z = d ( x )$ are receiving light and scattering part of the light back to the camera.\n89\t\n90\tAt depth ?, the light intensity received by the thin layer of smoke ?? is $E ( z ) =$ ?02 ?−?? . The scattering intensity per unit volume is determined by the ? scattering $\\frac { I _ { 0 } } { z ^ { 2 } } e ^ { - \\beta z }$ $\\beta$ coefficient and the backscatter probability (phase function $P ( \\pi ) ~ )$ . This part of the scattered light is transmitted back to the camera and needs to pass through the attenuation e of the distance ? again. Therefore, the total backscattered light intensity $B ( x )$ is the integral of the scattering contribution of all microelements on the line of sight:\n91\t\n92\t$$\n93\tB (x) = \\int_ {z _ {m i n}} ^ {d (x)} \\left(\\frac {I _ {0}}{z ^ {2}} e ^ {- \\beta z}\\right) \\cdot \\beta P (\\pi) \\cdot e ^ {- \\beta z} d z\n94\t$$\n95\t\n96\tAssuming that the scattering medium is uniform and the phase function is constant (let $k = I _ { 0 } \\beta P ( \\pi ) \\rangle$ ), the integration is simplified to:\n97\t\n98\t$$\n99\tB (x) = k \\int_ {z _ {m i n}} ^ {d (x)} \\frac {e ^ {- 2 \\beta z}}{z ^ {2}} d z\n100\t$$"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "tool_w9ECM97RiD0OVW3ZqTk8DOTD",
|
||
"name": "Grep",
|
||
"input": {
|
||
"pattern": "去雾|dehaze|haze",
|
||
"path": "E:\\my-vault\\Dehaze\\Papers\\ORI_MD\\translation-去雾\\translation-去雾.md",
|
||
"output_mode": "content",
|
||
"head_limit": 30
|
||
},
|
||
"status": "completed",
|
||
"isExpanded": false,
|
||
"result": "binary file matches (found \"\\0\" byte around offset 14187)"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "tool_HeExlBI5KaNkHZoxBykao7VT",
|
||
"name": "Read",
|
||
"input": {
|
||
"file_path": "E:\\my-vault\\.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\templates\\theoretical_paper_template.md"
|
||
},
|
||
"status": "completed",
|
||
"isExpanded": false,
|
||
"result": "1\t# Theoretical Paper Template\n2\t\n3\t## Usage\n4\tThis template provides the skeleton for a paper that develops, critiques, or extends a theoretical framework.\n5\t\n6\t---\n7\t\n8\t# [Paper Title in Title Case]\n9\t\n10\t**Author(s):** [Author Name(s)]\n11\t**Affiliation(s):** [Department, Institution]\n12\t**Date:** [Date]\n13\t\n14\t---\n15\t\n16\t## Abstract\n17\t\n18\t[Theoretical problem addressed: 1-2 sentences.]\n19\t[Purpose of the analysis: 1 sentence.]\n20\t[Analytical approach: 1 sentence.]\n21\t[Key contribution (new framework/critique/extension): 2 sentences.]\n22\t[Implications: 1 sentence.]\n23\t\n24\t**Keywords**: [keyword1], [keyword2], [keyword3], [keyword4], [keyword5]\n25\t\n26\t---\n27\t\n28\t## 1. Introduction\n29\t\n30\t### 1.1 The Theoretical Problem\n31\t[What theoretical issue or gap motivates this paper?]\n32\t\n33\t### 1.2 Why This Theory Matters\n34\t[What practical or intellectual consequences depend on getting this right?]\n35\t\n36\t### 1.3 Purpose and Contribution\n37\t[What does this paper do? Develop, critique, extend, or synthesize?]\n38\t\n39\t---\n40\t\n41\t## 2. Background: The Theory in Context\n42\t\n43\t### 2.1 Origins and Development\n44\t[Historical development of the theory. Key thinkers and milestones.]\n45\t\n46\t### 2.2 Key Concepts and Definitions\n47\t[Define the core constructs, their relationships, and boundaries.]\n48\t\n49\t### 2.3 Current State of the Theory\n50\t[How is the theory used today? Dominant interpretations and applications.]\n51\t\n52\t---\n53\t\n54\t## 3. Critical Analysis\n55\t\n56\t### 3.1 Strengths of the Framework\n57\t[What does the theory do well? Evidence of its explanatory power.]\n58\t\n59\t### 3.2 Limitations and Gaps\n60\t[Where does the theory fall short? What can't it explain?]\n61\t\n62\t### 3.3 Competing Perspectives\n63\t[What alternative theories address the same phenomena? How do they compare?]\n64\t\n65\t### 3.4 Empirical Support (or Lack Thereof)\n66\t[What does the evidence say? Are the theory's predictions supported?]\n67\t\n68\t---\n69\t\n70\t## 4. Proposed Extension / Revision\n71\t\n72\t### 4.1 New Dimensions or Modifications\n73\t[What changes or additions does this paper propose?]\n74\t\n75\t### 4.2 Conceptual Model\n76\t[Present the revised or new framework, ideally with a visual model.]\n77\t\n78\t### 4.3 Propositions for Testing\n79\t[What testable predictions does the revised framework generate?]\n80\t\n81\t| Proposition | Description | Testable Via |\n82\t|-------------|-------------|-------------|\n83\t| P1 | [proposition] | [method] |\n84\t| P2 | [proposition] | [method] |\n85\t| P3 | [proposition] | [method] |\n86\t\n87\t---\n88\t\n89\t## 5. Applications and Implications\n90\t\n91\t### 5.1 Theoretical Implications\n92\t[How does this contribute to the broader theoretical landscape?]\n93\t\n94\t### 5.2 Practical Applications\n95\t[How can practitioners use this framework?]\n96\t\n97\t### 5.3 Methodological Implications\n98\t[What new methods does this framework call for?]\n99\t\n100\t---\n101\t\n102\t## 6. Conclusion\n103\t\n104\t### 6.1 Summary of Contribution\n105\t[1 paragraph restating the paper's key contribution.]\n106\t\n107\t### 6.2 Limitations of the Analysis\n108\t[Acknowledge the boundaries of this theoretical work.]\n109\t\n110\t### 6.3 Future Directions\n111\t[What research should follow?]\n112\t\n113\t---\n114\t\n115\t## AI Disclosure\n116\t[Standard AI disclosure statement.]\n117\t\n118\t## References\n119\t[Complete reference list.]\n120\t"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "tool_0RWLK2CmFbwBsDKMFu9iOE4M",
|
||
"name": "Read",
|
||
"input": {
|
||
"file_path": "E:\\my-vault\\.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\templates\\literature_review_template.md"
|
||
},
|
||
"status": "completed",
|
||
"isExpanded": false,
|
||
"result": "1\t# Literature Review Paper Template\n2\t\n3\t## Usage\n4\tThis template provides the skeleton for a thematic literature review paper that synthesizes existing research, identifies gaps, and proposes future directions.\n5\t\n6\t---\n7\t\n8\t# [Paper Title in Title Case]\n9\t\n10\t**Author(s):** [Author Name(s)]\n11\t**Affiliation(s):** [Department, Institution]\n12\t**Date:** [Date]\n13\t\n14\t---\n15\t\n16\t## Abstract\n17\t\n18\t[Background and rationale: 1-2 sentences.]\n19\t[Purpose and scope of the review: 1 sentence.]\n20\t[Method: 1 sentence on search strategy and source selection.]\n21\t[Key findings from the synthesis: 2-3 sentences.]\n22\t[Implications and identified gaps: 1-2 sentences.]\n23\t\n24\t**Keywords**: [keyword1], [keyword2], [keyword3], [keyword4], [keyword5]\n25\t\n26\t---\n27\t\n28\t## 1. Introduction\n29\t\n30\t### 1.1 Topic and Rationale\n31\t[Why is this literature review needed? What makes it timely?]\n32\t[2 paragraphs with citations]\n33\t\n34\t### 1.2 Scope and Boundaries\n35\t[What is included and excluded? Time period? Disciplines? Geographies?]\n36\t[1 paragraph]\n37\t\n38\t### 1.3 Review Methodology\n39\t[Search strategy: databases, keywords, inclusion/exclusion criteria.]\n40\t[Number of sources reviewed.]\n41\t[1-2 paragraphs]\n42\t\n43\t### 1.4 Organization of the Review\n44\t[Preview the thematic structure.]\n45\t[1 paragraph]\n46\t\n47\t---\n48\t\n49\t## 2. [Theme 1: Descriptive Title]\n50\t\n51\t### 2.1 [Sub-Theme A]\n52\t[Review literature on this sub-theme.]\n53\t[2-3 paragraphs with citations]\n54\t\n55\t### 2.2 [Sub-Theme B]\n56\t[Review literature on this sub-theme.]\n57\t[2-3 paragraphs with citations]\n58\t\n59\t### 2.3 Summary of Theme 1\n60\t[What does the literature collectively tell us about this theme?]\n61\t[1 paragraph]\n62\t\n63\t---\n64\t\n65\t## 3. [Theme 2: Descriptive Title]\n66\t\n67\t### 3.1 [Sub-Theme A]\n68\t[2-3 paragraphs with citations]\n69\t\n70\t### 3.2 [Sub-Theme B]\n71\t[2-3 paragraphs with citations]\n72\t\n73\t### 3.3 Summary of Theme 2\n74\t[1 paragraph]\n75\t\n76\t---\n77\t\n78\t## 4. [Theme 3: Descriptive Title]\n79\t\n80\t### 4.1 [Sub-Theme A]\n81\t[2-3 paragraphs with citations]\n82\t\n83\t### 4.2 [Sub-Theme B]\n84\t[2-3 paragraphs with citations]\n85\t\n86\t### 4.3 Summary of Theme 3\n87\t[1 paragraph]\n88\t\n89\t---\n90\t\n91\t## 5. Cross-Cutting Synthesis\n92\t\n93\t### 5.1 Convergent Findings\n94\t[What do the themes agree on? What patterns emerge across themes?]\n95\t[1-2 paragraphs]\n96\t\n97\t### 5.2 Divergent Findings and Debates\n98\t[Where do researchers disagree? What are the unresolved debates?]\n99\t[1-2 paragraphs]\n100\t\n101\t### 5.3 Methodological Observations\n102\t[What methods dominate? What methods are underused?]\n103\t[1 paragraph]\n104\t\n105\t---\n106\t\n107\t## 6. Research Gaps and Future Directions\n108\t\n109\t### 6.1 Identified Gaps\n110\t[List and discuss 3-5 specific gaps in the literature.]\n111\t[1-2 paragraphs]\n112\t\n113\t### 6.2 Proposed Research Agenda\n114\t[What should future researchers investigate? What methods should they use?]\n115\t[1-2 paragraphs]\n116\t\n117\t---\n118\t\n119\t## 7. Conclusion\n120\t\n121\t### 7.1 Key Takeaways\n122\t[Summarize the 3-5 most important insights from the review.]\n123\t\n124\t### 7.2 Implications for Practice and Policy\n125\t[How should practitioners or policymakers use these insights?]\n126\t\n127\t---\n128\t\n129\t## AI Disclosure\n130\t[Standard AI disclosure statement.]\n131\t\n132\t---\n133\t\n134\t## References\n135\t[Complete reference list in selected citation format.]\n136\t"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "tool_WCpRDW0J97YnbiV1Rb5o9YcJ",
|
||
"name": "Read",
|
||
"input": {
|
||
"file_path": "E:\\my-vault\\.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\templates\\case_study_template.md"
|
||
},
|
||
"status": "completed",
|
||
"isExpanded": false,
|
||
"result": "1\t# Case Study Paper Template\n2\t\n3\t## Usage\n4\tThis template provides the skeleton for an in-depth case study paper analyzing specific institutions, programs, events, or phenomena.\n5\t\n6\t---\n7\t\n8\t# [Paper Title in Title Case]\n9\t\n10\t**Author(s):** [Author Name(s)]\n11\t**Affiliation(s):** [Department, Institution]\n12\t**Date:** [Date]\n13\t\n14\t---\n15\t\n16\t## Abstract\n17\t\n18\t[Background and case significance: 1-2 sentences.]\n19\t[Purpose: 1 sentence.]\n20\t[Method and data sources: 1-2 sentences.]\n21\t[Key findings from the case: 2-3 sentences.]\n22\t[Lessons and transferability: 1 sentence.]\n23\t\n24\t**Keywords**: [keyword1], [keyword2], [keyword3], [keyword4], [keyword5]\n25\t\n26\t---\n27\t\n28\t## 1. Introduction\n29\t\n30\t### 1.1 Background and Rationale\n31\t[Why study this case? What makes it significant or instructive?]\n32\t\n33\t### 1.2 Case Selection Justification\n34\t[Why this specific case? Intrinsic interest, typicality, or extreme/deviant case?]\n35\t\n36\t### 1.3 Research Questions\n37\t1. **RQ1**: [Question 1]?\n38\t2. **RQ2**: [Question 2]?\n39\t\n40\t---\n41\t\n42\t## 2. Literature Context\n43\t\n44\t### 2.1 Relevant Theoretical Framework\n45\t[What theory informs the analysis?]\n46\t\n47\t### 2.2 Prior Research on Similar Cases\n48\t[What do we know from comparable cases?]\n49\t\n50\t---\n51\t\n52\t## 3. Case Description\n53\t\n54\t### 3.1 Context and Setting\n55\t[Institutional/organizational/geographical context.]\n56\t\n57\t### 3.2 Key Actors and Stakeholders\n58\t[Who are the main players? What are their roles and interests?]\n59\t\n60\t### 3.3 Timeline of Events\n61\t[Chronological narrative of key developments.]\n62\t\n63\t| Period | Key Event | Significance |\n64\t|--------|-----------|-------------|\n65\t| [Date] | [Event] | [Why it matters] |\n66\t\n67\t### 3.4 Data Sources\n68\t[Documents, interviews, observations, archival data used.]\n69\t\n70\t---\n71\t\n72\t## 4. Analysis\n73\t\n74\t### 4.1 Analysis Framework\n75\t[How the data were analyzed. Coding strategy, analytical lens.]\n76\t\n77\t### 4.2 [Theme/Finding 1]\n78\t[Detailed analysis with evidence from the case data.]\n79\t\n80\t### 4.3 [Theme/Finding 2]\n81\t[Detailed analysis with evidence from the case data.]\n82\t\n83\t### 4.4 [Theme/Finding 3]\n84\t[Detailed analysis with evidence from the case data.]\n85\t\n86\t---\n87\t\n88\t## 5. Discussion\n89\t\n90\t### 5.1 Cross-Theme Synthesis\n91\t[How do the themes/findings relate to each other?]\n92\t\n93\t### 5.2 Comparison with Literature\n94\t[How does this case compare with prior research?]\n95\t\n96\t### 5.3 Theoretical Insights\n97\t[What does this case contribute to theory?]\n98\t\n99\t### 5.4 Transferability\n100\t[To what extent can lessons from this case apply elsewhere? (Note: case studies aim for transferability, not generalizability.)]\n101\t\n102\t---\n103\t\n104\t## 6. Lessons Learned and Recommendations\n105\t\n106\t### 6.1 For Practitioners\n107\t[Actionable recommendations for people in similar situations.]\n108\t\n109\t### 6.2 For Policymakers\n110\t[Policy implications from the case.]\n111\t\n112\t### 6.3 For Researchers\n113\t[What further research does this case suggest?]\n114\t\n115\t---\n116\t\n117\t## 7. Conclusion\n118\t[Key takeaways and closing statement.]\n119\t\n120\t---\n121\t\n122\t## AI Disclosure\n123\t[Standard AI disclosure statement.]\n124\t\n125\t## References\n126\t[Complete reference list.]\n127\t\n128\t## Appendices\n129\t### Appendix A: [Case Documents / Interview Protocol / Data Summary]\n130\t"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "tool_fqDBtWXTWKx9lDB2C1hF9LEu",
|
||
"name": "Read",
|
||
"input": {
|
||
"file_path": "E:\\my-vault\\.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\references\\paper_structure_patterns.md"
|
||
},
|
||
"status": "completed",
|
||
"isExpanded": false,
|
||
"result": "1\t# Paper Structure Patterns — 6 Paper Structure Models\n2\t\n3\tUsed by `structure_architect_agent` and `intake_agent` to select the appropriate paper structure.\n4\t\n5\t## Pattern 1: IMRaD (Introduction-Method-Results-Discussion)\n6\t\n7\t**Best for**: Empirical research with original data collection and analysis\n8\t**Typical length**: 5,000-8,000 words\n9\t**Disciplines**: Sciences, Social Sciences, Education, Medicine\n10\t\n11\t### Structure\n12\t\n13\t```\n14\t1. Title Page\n15\t2. Abstract (150-250 words)\n16\t Keywords (5-7)\n17\t3. Introduction\n18\t 3.1 Context and Background\n19\t 3.2 Problem Statement\n20\t 3.3 Research Gap\n21\t 3.4 Purpose and Research Questions\n22\t 3.5 Significance of the Study\n23\t4. Literature Review\n24\t 4.1 Theoretical Framework\n25\t 4.2 Theme 1: [related research]\n26\t 4.3 Theme 2: [related research]\n27\t 4.4 Theme 3: [related research]\n28\t 4.5 Summary and Conceptual Framework\n29\t5. Methodology\n30\t 5.1 Research Design\n31\t 5.2 Participants/Sample\n32\t 5.3 Data Collection\n33\t 5.4 Instruments/Measures\n34\t 5.5 Data Analysis\n35\t 5.6 Validity and Reliability\n36\t 5.7 Ethical Considerations\n37\t6. Results/Findings\n38\t 6.1 Descriptive Statistics (if quantitative)\n39\t 6.2 Finding 1 (aligned with RQ1)\n40\t 6.3 Finding 2 (aligned with RQ2)\n41\t 6.4 Finding 3 (if applicable)\n42\t7. Discussion\n43\t 7.1 Summary of Findings\n44\t 7.2 Interpretation and Comparison with Literature\n45\t 7.3 Theoretical Implications\n46\t 7.4 Practical Implications\n47\t 7.5 Limitations\n48\t 7.6 Future Research Directions\n49\t8. Conclusion\n50\t9. References\n51\t10. Appendices (if applicable)\n52\t```\n53\t\n54\t### Word Allocation (6,000-word example)\n55\t| Section | % | Words |\n56\t|---------|---|-------|\n57\t| Introduction | 15% | 900 |\n58\t| Literature Review | 25% | 1,500 |\n59\t| Methodology | 15% | 900 |\n60\t| Results | 20% | 1,200 |\n61\t| Discussion | 20% | 1,200 |\n62\t| Conclusion | 5% | 300 |\n63\t\n64\t---\n65\t\n66\t## Pattern 2: Thematic Literature Review\n67\t\n68\t**Best for**: Synthesizing existing research, identifying gaps, proposing future directions\n69\t**Typical length**: 6,000-10,000 words\n70\t**Disciplines**: All (especially Social Sciences, Education, Humanities)\n71\t\n72\t### Structure\n73\t\n74\t```\n75\t1. Title Page\n76\t2. Abstract\n77\t Keywords\n78\t3. Introduction\n79\t 3.1 Topic and Rationale\n80\t 3.2 Scope and Boundaries\n81\t 3.3 Review Methodology (search strategy, inclusion criteria)\n82\t 3.4 Organization of the Review\n83\t4. Theme 1: [descriptive title]\n84\t 4.1 Sub-theme A\n85\t 4.2 Sub-theme B\n86\t 4.3 Summary of Theme 1\n87\t5. Theme 2: [descriptive title]\n88\t 5.1 Sub-theme A\n89\t 5.2 Sub-theme B\n90\t 5.3 Summary of Theme 2\n91\t6. Theme 3: [descriptive title]\n92\t 6.1 Sub-theme A\n93\t 6.2 Sub-theme B\n94\t 6.3 Summary of Theme 3\n95\t7. Cross-Cutting Synthesis\n96\t 7.1 Convergent Findings\n97\t 7.2 Divergent Findings and Debates\n98\t 7.3 Methodological Observations\n99\t8. Research Gaps and Future Directions\n100\t 8.1 Identified Gaps\n101\t 8.2 Proposed Research Agenda\n102\t9. Conclusion\n103\t 9.1 Key Takeaways\n104\t 9.2 Implications for Practice/Policy\n105\t10. References\n106\t```\n107\t\n108\t### Word Allocation (8,000-word example)\n109\t| Section | % | Words |\n110\t|---------|---|-------|\n111\t| Introduction | 10% | 800 |\n112\t| Theme 1 | 20% | 1,600 |\n113\t| Theme 2 | 20% | 1,600 |\n114\t| Theme 3 | 20% | 1,600 |\n115\t| Synthesis | 15% | 1,200 |\n116\t| Gaps & Future | 10% | 800 |\n117\t| Conclusion | 5% | 400 |\n118\t\n119\t---\n120\t\n121\t## Pattern 3: Theoretical Analysis\n122\t\n123\t**Best for**: Developing, critiquing, or extending theoretical frameworks\n124\t**Typical length**: 5,000-8,000 words\n125\t**Disciplines**: Social Sciences, Philosophy, Education\n126\t\n127\t### Structure\n128\t\n129\t```\n130\t1. Title Page\n131\t2. Abstract\n132\t Keywords\n133\t3. Introduction\n134\t 3.1 The Theoretical Problem\n135\t 3.2 Why This Theory Matters\n136\t 3.3 Purpose and Contribution\n137\t4. Background: The Theory in Context\n138\t 4.1 Origins and Development\n139\t 4.2 Key Concepts and Definitions\n140\t 4.3 Current State of the Theory\n141\t5. Critical Analysis\n142\t 5.1 Strengths of the Framework\n143\t 5.2 Limitations and Gaps\n144\t 5.3 Competing Perspectives\n145\t 5.4 Empirical Support (or lack thereof)\n146\t6. Proposed Extension/Revision\n147\t 6.1 New Dimensions or Modifications\n148\t 6.2 Conceptual Model\n149\t 6.3 Propositions for Testing\n150\t7. Applications and Implications\n151\t 7.1 Theoretical Implications\n152\t 7.2 Practical Applications\n153\t 7.3 Methodological Implications\n154\t8. Conclusion\n155\t 8.1 Summary of Contribution\n156\t 8.2 Limitations of the Analysis\n157\t 8.3 Future Directions\n158\t9. References\n159\t```\n160\t\n161\t### Word Allocation (6,000-word example)\n162\t| Section | % | Words |\n163\t|---------|---|-------|\n164\t| Introduction | 12% | 720 |\n165\t| Background | 20% | 1,200 |\n166\t| Critical Analysis | 28% | 1,680 |\n167\t| Extension | 20% | 1,200 |\n168\t| Applications | 15% | 900 |\n169\t| Conclusion | 5% | 300 |\n170\t\n171\t---\n172\t\n173\t## Pattern 4: Case Study\n174\t\n175\t**Best for**: In-depth analysis of specific institutions, programs, events, or phenomena\n176\t**Typical length**: 4,000-7,000 words\n177\t**Disciplines**: Education, Business, Social Sciences, Medicine (clinical)\n178\t\n179\t### Structure\n180\t\n181\t```\n182\t1. Title Page\n183\t2. Abstract\n184\t Keywords\n185\t3. Introduction\n186\t 3.1 Background and Rationale\n187\t 3.2 Case Selection Justification\n188\t 3.3 Research Questions\n189\t4. Literature Context\n190\t 4.1 Relevant Theoretical Framework\n191\t 4.2 Prior Research on Similar Cases\n192\t5. Case Description\n193\t 5.1 Context and Setting\n194\t 5.2 Key Actors and Stakeholders\n195\t 5.3 Timeline of Events\n196\t 5.4 Data Sources\n197\t6. Analysis\n198\t 6.1 Analysis Framework\n199\t 6.2 Theme/Finding 1\n200\t 6.3 Theme/Finding 2\n201\t 6.4 Theme/Finding 3\n202\t7. Discussion\n203\t 7.1 Cross-Theme Synthesis\n204\t 7.2 Comparison with Literature\n205\t 7.3 Theoretical Insights\n206\t 7.4 Transferability (not generalizability)\n207\t8. Lessons Learned and Recommendations\n208\t 8.1 For Practitioners\n209\t 8.2 For Policymakers\n210\t 8.3 For Researchers\n211\t9. Conclusion\n212\t10. References\n213\t11. Appendices (case documents, data)\n214\t```\n215\t\n216\t### Word Allocation (5,000-word example)\n217\t| Section | % | Words |\n218\t|---------|---|-------|\n219\t| Introduction | 12% | 600 |\n220\t| Literature | 15% | 750 |\n221\t| Case Description | 20% | 1,000 |\n222\t| Analysis | 25% | 1,250 |\n223\t| Discussion | 18% | 900 |\n224\t| Recommendations | 7% | 350 |\n225\t| Conclusion | 3% | 150 |\n226\t\n227\t---\n228\t\n229\t## Pattern 5: Policy Brief\n230\t\n231\t**Best for**: Evidence-based policy recommendations for decision-makers\n232\t**Typical length**: 2,000-4,000 words\n233\t**Disciplines**: Public Policy, Education, Health, Economics\n234\t\n235\t### Structure\n236\t\n237\t```\n238\t1. Title and Author Information\n239\t2. Executive Summary (200-300 words)\n240\t Key recommendations (3-5 bullet points)\n241\t3. Background\n242\t 3.1 The Policy Problem\n243\t 3.2 Current Policy Context\n244\t 3.3 Why Action is Needed Now\n245\t4. Evidence Base\n246\t 4.1 Key Finding 1\n247\t 4.2 Key Finding 2\n248\t 4.3 Key Finding 3\n249\t 4.4 International Comparisons (if relevant)\n250\t5. Policy Options Analysis\n251\t 5.1 Option A: [description]\n252\t - Pros / Cons / Cost / Feasibility\n253\t 5.2 Option B: [description]\n254\t - Pros / Cons / Cost / Feasibility\n255\t 5.3 Option C: [description]\n256\t - Pros / Cons / Cost / Feasibility\n257\t6. Recommendations\n258\t 6.1 Recommended Option with Justification\n259\t 6.2 Implementation Steps\n260\t 6.3 Timeline\n261\t 6.4 Success Metrics\n262\t7. Conclusion\n263\t8. References\n264\t9. Appendix: Methodology Note\n265\t```\n266\t\n267\t### Word Allocation (3,000-word example)\n268\t| Section | % | Words |\n269\t|---------|---|-------|\n270\t| Executive Summary | 10% | 300 |\n271\t| Background | 15% | 450 |\n272\t| Evidence | 30% | 900 |\n273\t| Options | 25% | 750 |\n274\t| Recommendations | 15% | 450 |\n275\t| Conclusion | 5% | 150 |\n276\t\n277\t---\n278\t\n279\t## Pattern 6: Conference Paper\n280\t\n281\t**Best for**: Presenting research in progress or completed studies at academic conferences\n282\t**Typical length**: 2,000-5,000 words (varies by conference)\n283\t**Disciplines**: All\n284\t\n285\t### Structure (Short Paper)\n286\t\n287\t```\n288\t1. Title, Authors, Affiliations\n289\t2. Abstract (100-200 words)\n290\t Keywords\n291\t3. Introduction\n292\t 3.1 Problem and Motivation\n293\t 3.2 Research Question(s)\n294\t4. Related Work\n295\t 4.1 Key Prior Studies\n296\t 4.2 Gap This Paper Addresses\n297\t5. Approach / Methodology\n298\t 5.1 Design\n299\t 5.2 Data/Materials\n300\t 5.3 Analysis\n301\t6. Results (Preliminary or Complete)\n302\t 6.1 Key Findings\n303\t 6.2 Tables/Figures\n304\t7. Discussion\n305\t 7.1 Interpretation\n306\t 7.2 Limitations\n307\t8. Conclusion and Future Work\n308\t9. References\n309\t```\n310\t\n311\t### Word Allocation (3,000-word example)\n312\t| Section | % | Words |\n313\t|---------|---|-------|\n314\t| Introduction | 15% | 450 |\n315\t| Related Work | 20% | 600 |\n316\t| Methodology | 20% | 600 |\n317\t| Results | 25% | 750 |\n318\t| Discussion | 12% | 360 |\n319\t| Conclusion | 8% | 240 |\n320\t\n321\t## Pattern Selection Guide\n322\t\n323\t| If your paper... | Use Pattern |\n324\t|-----------------|-------------|\n325\t| Has original data collection | IMRaD |\n326\t| Synthesizes existing literature | Literature Review |\n327\t| Develops/critiques a theory | Theoretical |\n328\t| Analyzes specific cases in depth | Case Study |\n329\t| Recommends policy actions | Policy Brief |\n330\t| Presents at a conference | Conference Paper |\n331\t"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "tool_EgpqQRww5jxuW9VkBCDf2Vu1",
|
||
"name": "Read",
|
||
"input": {
|
||
"file_path": "E:\\my-vault\\.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\references\\workflow_phase_details.md",
|
||
"limit": 100
|
||
},
|
||
"status": "completed",
|
||
"isExpanded": false,
|
||
"result": "1\t# Orchestration Workflow — Phase Details\n2\t\n3\tDetailed per-phase agent behavior and output descriptions for the 8-phase orchestration workflow.\n4\t\n5\t---\n6\t\n7\t## Phase 0: CONFIG (Interactive)\n8\t\n9\t**Agent**: `intake_agent`\n10\t**Output**: Paper Configuration Record\n11\t\n12\t- Paper type (IMRaD / Lit Review / Theoretical / Case Study / Policy Brief / Conference)\n13\t- Discipline and sub-field\n14\t- Target journal (optional)\n15\t- Citation format (APA 7 / Chicago / MLA / IEEE / Vancouver)\n16\t- Output format (LaTeX / DOCX / PDF / Markdown / Combined)\n17\t- Language (EN / zh-TW / bilingual sections)\n18\t- Bilingual abstract (Yes / EN-only / zh-TW-only)\n19\t- Word count target\n20\t- Existing materials (RQ, data, drafts, lit)\n21\t\n22\t**Checkpoint**: User confirms configuration.\n23\t\n24\t---\n25\t\n26\t## Phase 1: RESEARCH\n27\t\n28\t**Agent**: `literature_strategist_agent`\n29\t**Output**: Search Strategy + Source Corpus\n30\t\n31\t- Database selection + search strings\n32\t- Inclusion/exclusion criteria\n33\t- Source screening + annotated bibliography\n34\t- Literature matrix (Source x Theme)\n35\t- Research gap mapping\n36\t\n37\t**Checkpoint**: User reviews sources (optional add/remove).\n38\t\n39\t---\n40\t\n41\t## Phase 2: ARCHITECTURE\n42\t\n43\t**Agent**: `structure_architect_agent`\n44\t**Output**: Paper Outline + Evidence Map\n45\t\n46\t- Structure pattern selection (from paper_structure_patterns.md)\n47\t- Section-by-section outline with word count allocation\n48\t- Evidence-to-section assignment\n49\t- Transition logic between sections\n50\t\n51\t**Checkpoint**: User approves outline.\n52\t\n53\t---\n54\t\n55\t## Phase 3: ARGUMENTATION\n56\t\n57\t**Agent**: `argument_builder_agent`\n58\t**Output**: Argument Blueprint\n59\t\n60\t- Central thesis + sub-arguments\n61\t- Claim-Evidence-Reasoning chains per section\n62\t- Counter-argument identification + rebuttal strategy\n63\t- Logical flow diagram\n64\t\n65\t---\n66\t\n67\t## Phase 4: DRAFTING\n68\t\n69\t**Agent**: `draft_writer_agent`\n70\t**Output**: Complete Draft\n71\t\n72\t- Section-by-section writing following outline\n73\t- Register adjustment for discipline\n74\t- In-text citations integrated\n75\t- Word count tracking per section\n76\t- Transition paragraphs between sections\n77\t\n78\t---\n79\t\n80\t## Phase 5a & 5b: CITATIONS + ABSTRACT (Parallel)\n81\t\n82\t### Phase 5a: Citations\n83\t\n84\t**Agent**: `citation_compliance_agent`\n85\t**Output**: Citation Audit Report\n86\t\n87\t- In-text <-> reference list cross-check (zero orphans)\n88\t- Format compliance (per selected style)\n89\t- DOI/URL verification\n90\t- Self-citation ratio check\n91\t- Auto-correction of detected errors\n92\t\n93\t### Phase 5b: Abstract\n94\t\n95\t**Agent**: `abstract_bilingual_agent`\n96\t**Output**: Bilingual Abstract + Keywords\n97\t\n98\t- English abstract (150-300 words, structured)\n99\t- Traditional Chinese abstract (300-500 characters, structured)\n100\t- EN keywords (5-7)"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "tool_Q1qL3pE6rIzpfTj7UOYdStzI",
|
||
"name": "Bash",
|
||
"input": {
|
||
"command": "find /e/my-vault -maxdepth 3 -type f -name \"*.md\" | grep -v \".obsidian\" | grep -v \".git\" | head -30",
|
||
"description": "List user-created markdown files"
|
||
},
|
||
"status": "completed",
|
||
"isExpanded": false,
|
||
"result": "/e/my-vault/copilot/copilot-custom-prompts/Clip Web Page.md\n/e/my-vault/copilot/copilot-custom-prompts/Clip YouTube Transcript.md\n/e/my-vault/copilot/copilot-custom-prompts/Emojify.md\n/e/my-vault/copilot/copilot-custom-prompts/Explain like I am 5.md\n/e/my-vault/copilot/copilot-custom-prompts/Fix grammar and spelling.md\n/e/my-vault/copilot/copilot-custom-prompts/Generate glossary.md\n/e/my-vault/copilot/copilot-custom-prompts/Generate table of contents.md\n/e/my-vault/copilot/copilot-custom-prompts/Make longer.md\n/e/my-vault/copilot/copilot-custom-prompts/Make shorter.md\n/e/my-vault/copilot/copilot-custom-prompts/Remove URLs.md\n/e/my-vault/copilot/copilot-custom-prompts/Rewrite as tweet thread.md\n/e/my-vault/copilot/copilot-custom-prompts/Rewrite as tweet.md\n/e/my-vault/copilot/copilot-custom-prompts/Simplify.md\n/e/my-vault/copilot/copilot-custom-prompts/Summarize.md\n/e/my-vault/copilot/copilot-custom-prompts/Translate to Chinese.md\n/e/my-vault/Excalidraw/Drawing 2026-04-22 22.40.08.excalidraw.md\n/e/my-vault/Excalidraw/Drawing 2026-04-22 22.49.48.excalidraw.md\n/e/my-vault/Excalidraw/Drawing 2026-04-22 22.49.50.excalidraw.md\n/e/my-vault/自动语义分割系统/系统设计.md"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "tool_mLc3JeE2BOI1QUThA7p2SvBR",
|
||
"name": "Bash",
|
||
"input": {
|
||
"command": "find /e/my-vault -maxdepth 2 -type d | grep -v \".obsidian\" | grep -v \".git\" | grep -v \".claude\" | grep -v \".claudian\"",
|
||
"description": "List top-level vault directories"
|
||
},
|
||
"status": "completed",
|
||
"isExpanded": false,
|
||
"result": "/e/my-vault\n/e/my-vault/copilot\n/e/my-vault/copilot/copilot-custom-prompts\n/e/my-vault/Dehaze\n/e/my-vault/Dehaze/Papers\n/e/my-vault/Excalidraw\n/e/my-vault/自动语义分割系统"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "tool_WIjPCqj0X0y9B8kSP7lheISi",
|
||
"name": "Read",
|
||
"input": {
|
||
"file_path": "E:\\my-vault\\.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\references\\journal_submission_guide.md",
|
||
"limit": 80
|
||
},
|
||
"status": "blocked",
|
||
"isExpanded": false,
|
||
"result": "1\t# Journal Submission Guide\n2\t\n3\tUsed by `formatter_agent` and `intake_agent`.\n4\t\n5\t## Pre-Submission Checklist\n6\t\n7\t### 1. Journal Selection Criteria\n8\t- [ ] Scope alignment: Does the journal publish papers on your topic?\n9\t- [ ] Audience match: Will the journal's readers care about your findings?\n10\t- [ ] Impact: Is the journal recognized in your field?\n11\t- [ ] Predatory check: Verify via Beall's List, DOAJ, or Cabells\n12\t- [ ] Open access: Does the journal offer OA options? What are the APCs?\n13\t- [ ] Timeline: What is the typical review turnaround?\n14\t- [ ] Rejection rate: Is it realistic for your paper's quality?\n15\t\n16\t### 2. Manuscript Preparation\n17\t- [ ] Follow journal's Author Guidelines exactly\n18\t- [ ] Word/page count within limits\n19\t- [ ] Correct citation format (may differ from your preferred style)\n20\t- [ ] Figures/tables meet resolution and format requirements\n21\t- [ ] Anonymized for double-blind review (if required)\n22\t- [ ] Author information page separate from main text\n23\t- [ ] Running head (if required)\n24\t- [ ] Line numbers (if required)\n25\t\n26\t### 3. Required Components\n27\t| Component | Usually Required | Notes |\n28\t|-----------|:---------------:|-------|\n29\t| Cover letter | ✓ | Addressed to Editor-in-Chief |\n30\t| Title page | ✓ | Title, authors, affiliations, corresponding author |\n31\t| Abstract | ✓ | Check word limit (often 150-250) |\n32\t| Keywords | ✓ | Usually 4-7 |\n33\t| Main text | ✓ | Following journal structure |\n34\t| References | ✓ | In journal's required format |\n35\t| Tables | Often | Separate files or embedded |\n36\t| Figures | Often | High-resolution, specific formats |\n37\t| Supplementary materials | Sometimes | Data, code, extended analyses |\n38\t| Author contributions (CRediT) | Increasingly | Who did what |\n39\t| Conflict of interest statement | ✓ | Even if no conflicts |\n40\t| Data availability statement | Increasingly | Where data can be accessed |\n41\t| Funding statement | ✓ | Grant numbers and funders |\n42\t| Ethics statement | If applicable | IRB approval, informed consent |\n43\t| AI disclosure | Increasingly | Nature, Science require this |\n44\t\n45\t## Common Journal Types in Higher Education\n46\t\n47\t### Top HEI Journals (International)\n48\t\n49\t| Journal | Impact | Citation Style | Typical Length |\n50\t|---------|--------|---------------|---------------|\n51\t| Higher Education | High | APA | 8,000-10,000 |\n52\t| Studies in Higher Education | High | APA | 6,000-8,000 |\n53\t| Research in Higher Education | High | APA | 6,000-10,000 |\n54\t| Quality in Higher Education | Medium | APA | 5,000-7,000 |\n55\t| Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education | Medium | APA | 5,000-8,000 |\n56\t| Journal of Higher Education | High | Chicago | 8,000-12,000 |\n57\t| Tertiary Education and Management | Medium | APA | 5,000-7,000 |\n58\t| International Journal of Educational Development | Medium | APA | 6,000-8,000 |\n59\t\n60\t### Major Multidisciplinary Journals\n61\t\n62\t| Journal | Impact | Citation Style | Typical Length | Open Access |\n63\t|---------|--------|---------------|---------------|-------------|\n64\t| Nature | Very High | Nature style | 3,000-5,000 | Hybrid |\n65\t| Science | Very High | Science style | 2,500-4,500 | Hybrid |\n66\t| PLOS ONE | Medium | Vancouver | No limit | Full OA |\n67\t| Frontiers (series) | Medium-High | Vancouver | 3,000-12,000 | Full OA |\n68\t| SAGE Open | Medium | APA | No limit | Full OA |\n69\t\n70\t### Major Education Journals (Beyond HEI)\n71\t\n72\t| Journal | Impact | Citation Style | Typical Length |\n73\t|---------|--------|---------------|---------------|\n74\t| Review of Educational Research | Very High | APA | 15,000-20,000 |\n75\t| Educational Researcher | High | APA | 5,000-8,000 |\n76\t| American Educational Research Journal | High | APA | 8,000-12,000 |\n77\t| British Educational Research Journal | High | APA | 6,000-8,000 |\n78\t| Teaching and Teacher Education | High | APA | 6,000-8,000 |\n79\t| Computers & Education | High | APA | 6,000-10,000 |\n80\t"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "tool_SGnapwvqlR1uIn1A72sj4yIT",
|
||
"name": "Read",
|
||
"input": {
|
||
"file_path": "E:\\my-vault\\.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\templates\\conference_paper_template.md"
|
||
},
|
||
"status": "completed",
|
||
"isExpanded": false,
|
||
"result": "1\t# Conference Paper Template\n2\t\n3\t## Usage\n4\tThis template provides the skeleton for a concise conference paper presenting research findings. Adapt length and depth to the specific conference requirements (typically 2,000-5,000 words).\n5\t\n6\t---\n7\t\n8\t# [Paper Title in Title Case]\n9\t\n10\t**Author(s):** [Author Name(s)]¹, [Co-Author]²\n11\t**¹** [Department, Institution, City, Country]\n12\t**²** [Department, Institution, City, Country]\n13\t**Contact:** [email@example.com]\n14\t\n15\t---\n16\t\n17\t## Abstract\n18\t\n19\t[Problem and motivation: 1 sentence.]\n20\t[Approach: 1 sentence.]\n21\t[Key results: 1-2 sentences.]\n22\t[Significance: 1 sentence.]\n23\t\n24\t**Keywords**: [keyword1], [keyword2], [keyword3], [keyword4], [keyword5]\n25\t\n26\t---\n27\t\n28\t## 1. Introduction\n29\t\n30\t### 1.1 Problem and Motivation\n31\t[What problem does this research address? Why is it important?]\n32\t[1-2 paragraphs]\n33\t\n34\t### 1.2 Research Question(s)\n35\t[State the specific question(s) this paper addresses.]\n36\t\n37\t### 1.3 Contribution\n38\t[What is new? How does this paper advance the field?]\n39\t[1 paragraph — be specific about the contribution]\n40\t\n41\t---\n42\t\n43\t## 2. Related Work\n44\t\n45\t### 2.1 [Key Prior Studies / Approach 1]\n46\t[Brief review of relevant work. Focus on most relevant studies.]\n47\t[1-2 paragraphs]\n48\t\n49\t### 2.2 [Key Prior Studies / Approach 2]\n50\t[1-2 paragraphs]\n51\t\n52\t### 2.3 Gap This Paper Addresses\n53\t[1 paragraph — how does this paper differ from or extend prior work?]\n54\t\n55\t---\n56\t\n57\t## 3. Approach / Methodology\n58\t\n59\t### 3.1 Research Design\n60\t[What method was used and why?]\n61\t\n62\t### 3.2 Data / Materials\n63\t[What data were collected or used? Sample/dataset description.]\n64\t\n65\t### 3.3 Analysis\n66\t[How were the data analyzed?]\n67\t\n68\t---\n69\t\n70\t## 4. Results\n71\t\n72\t### 4.1 [Key Finding 1]\n73\t[Present results with supporting evidence (tables, figures).]\n74\t\n75\t### 4.2 [Key Finding 2]\n76\t[Present results with supporting evidence.]\n77\t\n78\t### 4.3 [Key Finding 3] *(if applicable)*\n79\t[Additional findings.]\n80\t\n81\t---\n82\t\n83\t## 5. Discussion\n84\t\n85\t### 5.1 Interpretation\n86\t[What do the results mean? How do they relate to existing knowledge?]\n87\t\n88\t### 5.2 Limitations\n89\t[Acknowledge study limitations briefly.]\n90\t\n91\t---\n92\t\n93\t## 6. Conclusion and Future Work\n94\t\n95\t[Summary of contribution: 1-2 sentences.]\n96\t[Practical implications: 1 sentence.]\n97\t[Future work: 1-2 sentences describing next steps.]\n98\t\n99\t---\n100\t\n101\t## AI Disclosure\n102\t[Standard AI disclosure statement.]\n103\t\n104\t## Acknowledgments\n105\t[Funding sources, collaborators, reviewers.]\n106\t\n107\t## References\n108\t[Complete reference list. Conference papers typically have 15-25 references.]\n109\t"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "tool_YDY8QGMU6BH7XalGHyKJQlbT",
|
||
"name": "Read",
|
||
"input": {
|
||
"file_path": "E:\\my-vault\\.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\templates\\policy_brief_template.md"
|
||
},
|
||
"status": "completed",
|
||
"isExpanded": false,
|
||
"result": "1\t# Policy Brief Template\n2\t\n3\t## Usage\n4\tThis template provides the skeleton for an evidence-based policy brief targeting decision-makers. Policy briefs are shorter, more direct, and action-oriented than academic papers.\n5\t\n6\t---\n7\t\n8\t# [Policy Brief Title — Clear and Action-Oriented]\n9\t\n10\t**Author(s):** [Author Name(s)]\n11\t**Affiliation:** [Institution]\n12\t**Date:** [Date]\n13\t**Target Audience:** [e.g., MOE officials, university administrators, legislators]\n14\t\n15\t---\n16\t\n17\t## Executive Summary\n18\t\n19\t[The policy problem in 1-2 sentences.]\n20\t[Key evidence in 1-2 sentences.]\n21\t[Primary recommendation in 1-2 sentences.]\n22\t\n23\t### Key Recommendations\n24\t1. [Recommendation 1 — one sentence]\n25\t2. [Recommendation 2 — one sentence]\n26\t3. [Recommendation 3 — one sentence]\n27\t\n28\t---\n29\t\n30\t## 1. Background\n31\t\n32\t### 1.1 The Policy Problem\n33\t[What is the problem? Who is affected? How severe is it?]\n34\t[Use specific data to illustrate the problem.]\n35\t\n36\t### 1.2 Current Policy Context\n37\t[What existing policies or regulations are relevant?]\n38\t[What has already been tried?]\n39\t\n40\t### 1.3 Why Action is Needed Now\n41\t[What makes this urgent? What happens if nothing changes?]\n42\t[Include a compelling statistic or projection.]\n43\t\n44\t---\n45\t\n46\t## 2. Evidence Base\n47\t\n48\t### 2.1 Key Finding 1: [Title]\n49\t[Present evidence clearly with citations.]\n50\t[Include a figure or table if helpful.]\n51\t\n52\t### 2.2 Key Finding 2: [Title]\n53\t[Present evidence clearly with citations.]\n54\t\n55\t### 2.3 Key Finding 3: [Title]\n56\t[Present evidence clearly with citations.]\n57\t\n58\t### 2.4 International Comparisons *(if relevant)*\n59\t[How do other countries/regions handle this issue?]\n60\t[What can we learn from their experience?]\n61\t\n62\t---\n63\t\n64\t## 3. Policy Options Analysis\n65\t\n66\t### Option A: [Descriptive Name]\n67\t[1-2 paragraph description of the option.]\n68\t\n69\t| Criterion | Assessment |\n70\t|-----------|-----------|\n71\t| **Effectiveness** | [High/Medium/Low — brief justification] |\n72\t| **Feasibility** | [High/Medium/Low — brief justification] |\n73\t| **Cost** | [High/Medium/Low — estimate if available] |\n74\t| **Timeline** | [Short-term / Medium-term / Long-term] |\n75\t| **Political Acceptability** | [High/Medium/Low] |\n76\t\n77\t### Option B: [Descriptive Name]\n78\t[1-2 paragraph description.]\n79\t\n80\t| Criterion | Assessment |\n81\t|-----------|-----------|\n82\t| **Effectiveness** | [assessment] |\n83\t| **Feasibility** | [assessment] |\n84\t| **Cost** | [assessment] |\n85\t| **Timeline** | [timeline] |\n86\t| **Political Acceptability** | [assessment] |\n87\t\n88\t### Option C: [Descriptive Name]\n89\t[1-2 paragraph description.]\n90\t\n91\t| Criterion | Assessment |\n92\t|-----------|-----------|\n93\t| **Effectiveness** | [assessment] |\n94\t| **Feasibility** | [assessment] |\n95\t| **Cost** | [assessment] |\n96\t| **Timeline** | [timeline] |\n97\t| **Political Acceptability** | [assessment] |\n98\t\n99\t---\n100\t\n101\t## 4. Recommendations\n102\t\n103\t### 4.1 Recommended Option\n104\t[State the recommended option and justify the choice.]\n105\t[1-2 paragraphs]\n106\t\n107\t### 4.2 Implementation Steps\n108\t1. **Step 1** (Month 1-3): [action]\n109\t2. **Step 2** (Month 4-6): [action]\n110\t3. **Step 3** (Month 7-12): [action]\n111\t4. **Step 4** (Year 2+): [action]\n112\t\n113\t### 4.3 Success Metrics\n114\t| Metric | Baseline | Target | Timeline |\n115\t|--------|----------|--------|----------|\n116\t| [Metric 1] | [current value] | [target value] | [when] |\n117\t| [Metric 2] | [current value] | [target value] | [when] |\n118\t\n119\t### 4.4 Risk Mitigation\n120\t| Risk | Likelihood | Mitigation |\n121\t|------|-----------|-----------|\n122\t| [Risk 1] | [H/M/L] | [strategy] |\n123\t| [Risk 2] | [H/M/L] | [strategy] |\n124\t\n125\t---\n126\t\n127\t## 5. Conclusion\n128\t[1 paragraph restating the urgency and recommended action.]\n129\t\n130\t---\n131\t\n132\t## AI Disclosure\n133\t[Standard AI disclosure statement.]\n134\t\n135\t## References\n136\t[Complete reference list — keep concise for policy brief audience.]\n137\t\n138\t## Appendix: Methodology Note\n139\t[Brief description of how the evidence was gathered and analyzed.]\n140\t"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "tool_8zjpQ0k1GLcb8IZ3or3Xmpbv",
|
||
"name": "Read",
|
||
"input": {
|
||
"file_path": "E:\\my-vault\\.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\deep-research\\templates\\evidence_assessment_template.md"
|
||
},
|
||
"status": "completed",
|
||
"isExpanded": false,
|
||
"result": "1\t# Evidence Assessment Template\n2\t\n3\t## Purpose\n4\tPer-source quality assessment card. Used by the source_verification_agent to systematically evaluate each source entering the research pipeline.\n5\t\n6\t## Assessment Card\n7\t\n8\t```markdown\n9\t## Evidence Assessment Card\n10\t\n11\t### Source Identification\n12\t- **Citation (APA 7.0)**: [full reference]\n13\t- **DOI/URL**: [link]\n14\t- **Type**: [journal article / book / report / web / conference paper / thesis / other]\n15\t- **Access Date**: [when verified]\n16\t\n17\t---\n18\t\n19\t### Quality Assessment\n20\t\n21\t#### 1. Evidence Level\n22\t**Level**: [I / II / III / IV / V / VI / VII]\n23\t**Justification**: [why this level]\n24\t\n25\t#### 2. Publication Venue\n26\t- **Journal/Publisher**: [name]\n27\t- **Indexed in**: [Scopus / WoS / PubMed / DOAJ / other / none]\n28\t- **Impact Factor/CiteScore**: [value or N/A]\n29\t- **COPE member**: [Yes / No / Unknown]\n30\t- **Predatory indicators**: [None / Flags: list]\n31\t\n32\t**Venue Grade**: [Excellent / Good / Adequate / Questionable / Unacceptable]\n33\t\n34\t#### 3. Author Credibility\n35\t- **Author(s)**: [names]\n36\t- **Affiliation(s)**: [institutions]\n37\t- **ORCID**: [if available]\n38\t- **Track record**: [publication history in field]\n39\t- **Expertise match**: [relevant to topic? Yes/Partial/No]\n40\t\n41\t**Author Grade**: [Excellent / Good / Adequate / Unknown / Questionable]\n42\t\n43\t#### 4. Methodological Quality\n44\t- **Design**: [description]\n45\t- **Sample**: [size, selection, representativeness]\n46\t- **Analysis**: [appropriate for design?]\n47\t- **Limitations acknowledged**: [Yes / Partially / No]\n48\t- **Replicable**: [Yes / Partially / No]\n49\t\n50\t**Method Grade**: [Excellent / Good / Adequate / Weak / Flawed]\n51\t\n52\t#### 5. Currency\n53\t- **Publication year**: [YYYY]\n54\t- **Data collection period**: [if stated]\n55\t- **Field velocity**: [Rapid / Moderate / Slow / Foundational]\n56\t- **Still current**: [Yes / Conditionally / No]\n57\t\n58\t**Currency Grade**: [Current / Acceptable / Dated / Outdated / Foundational]\n59\t\n60\t#### 6. Conflict of Interest\n61\t- **Declared COI**: [None / Listed: details]\n62\t- **Funding source**: [source or Not stated]\n63\t- **Potential undeclared COI**: [None detected / Possible: details]\n64\t\n65\t**COI Grade**: [Clean / Minor / Moderate / Significant / Critical]\n66\t\n67\t---\n68\t\n69\t### Overall Assessment\n70\t\n71\t| Dimension | Grade |\n72\t|-----------|-------|\n73\t| Evidence Level | [I-VII] |\n74\t| Venue | [Excellent-Unacceptable] |\n75\t| Author | [Excellent-Questionable] |\n76\t| Method | [Excellent-Flawed] |\n77\t| Currency | [Current-Outdated] |\n78\t| COI | [Clean-Critical] |\n79\t| **Overall** | **[A / B / C / D / F]** |\n80\t\n81\t### Recommendation\n82\t- [ ] **Use as primary evidence** (Grade A-B)\n83\t- [ ] **Use as supporting evidence** (Grade B-C)\n84\t- [ ] **Use with explicit caveats** (Grade C-D)\n85\t- [ ] **Do not use** (Grade D-F) — Reason: [specific reason]\n86\t\n87\t### Notes\n88\t[Any additional observations, caveats, or context]\n89\t```\n90\t\n91\t## Batch Assessment Summary\n92\t\n93\t```markdown\n94\t## Source Verification Summary\n95\t\n96\t**Date**: [YYYY-MM-DD]\n97\t**Sources assessed**: [N]\n98\t**Assessor**: source_verification_agent\n99\t\n100\t### Grade Distribution\n101\t| Grade | Count | % |\n102\t|-------|-------|---|\n103\t| A (Excellent) | X | X% |\n104\t| B (Good) | X | X% |\n105\t| C (Adequate) | X | X% |\n106\t| D (Weak) | X | X% |\n107\t| F (Unacceptable) | X | X% |\n108\t\n109\t### Flagged Sources\n110\t| Source | Issue | Severity | Recommendation |\n111\t|--------|-------|----------|---------------|\n112\t| [ref] | [issue] | [High/Medium/Low] | [Include with caveat / Exclude] |\n113\t\n114\t### Predatory Journal Alerts\n115\t[List any flagged journals]\n116\t\n117\t### Overall Source Base Quality\n118\t**Assessment**: [Strong / Adequate / Mixed / Weak]\n119\t**Recommendation**: [Proceed / Supplement / Major revision of source base needed]\n120\t```\n121\t\n122\t## Usage Notes\n123\t- Complete one card per source for full verification\n124\t- Batch summary should be produced after all cards are complete\n125\t- Minimum spot-check: 20% of sources get full card assessment\n126\t- All Grade D/F sources require documented justification\n127\t- Any predatory journal flag requires full verification\n128\t"
|
||
}
|
||
],
|
||
"isExpanded": false,
|
||
"result": "Here is a comprehensive summary of what I found in your vault that can inform how to structure a new \"自动语义分割系统/系统设计.md\" document.\n\n---\n\n## Summary of Findings\n\n### 1. Current State of the Target File\n\n**File**: `E:\\my-vault\\自动语义分割系统\\系统设计.md`\n\nThis file already exists but is essentially empty — it contains only a single `#` character (line 1). This means you have a clean slate to work with.\n\n---\n\n### 2. Template Resources Found in the Vault\n\nYour vault contains extensive template libraries within the `.obsidian/plugins/skills/academic-research-skills/` directory. Here are the most relevant ones for structuring a system design document:\n\n#### A. Codebase/Technical Templates\n**File**: `E:\\my-vault\\.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\tutor-setup\\references\\codebase-templates.md`\n\nThis is the most directly relevant template for a \"system design\" document. It includes:\n\n- **Dashboard MOC Template** with frontmatter:\n ```yaml\n ---\n module: dashboard\n path: 00-Dashboard\n keywords: MOC, onboarding, architecture, <project-name>\n ---\n ```\n\n- **Module Note Template** with sections:\n - Purpose (1-3 sentences)\n - Key Files (table)\n - Public Interface (table)\n - Internal Flow (ASCII diagram)\n - Dependencies (Uses/Used by)\n - Configuration\n - Testing\n - Related Notes\n\n- **API Note Template** with endpoints, request/response schemas\n\n- **Quick Reference Template** with commands and environment setup\n\n#### B. Academic Paper Templates (6 Patterns)\n**File**: `E:\\my-vault\\.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\academic-paper\\references\\paper_structure_patterns.md`\n\nProvides six structural patterns:\n1. **IMRaD** (Introduction-Method-Results-Discussion) — for empirical research\n2. **Thematic Literature Review** — for synthesis\n3. **Theoretical Analysis** — for frameworks\n4. **Case Study** — for in-depth analysis\n5. **Policy Brief** — for recommendations\n6. **Conference Paper** — for concise presentation\n\nFor a system design document, **Pattern 1 (IMRaD)** or **Pattern 3 (Theoretical)** would be most adaptable, as they include:\n- Problem statement and background\n- Methodology/approach sections\n- Results/findings\n- Discussion and implications\n\n#### C. Research Brief Template\n**File**: `E:\\my-vault\\.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\deep-research\\templates\\research_brief_template.md`\n\nIncludes:\n- Executive Summary\n- Background & Research Question\n- Key Findings with evidence strength ratings\n- Analysis & Implications\n- Recommendations\n- Limitations\n- References\n\n#### D. PRISMA Protocol Template\n**File**: `E:\\my-vault\\.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\academic-research-skills\\deep-research\\templates\\prisma_protocol_template.md`\n\nVery structured with tables for:\n- Administrative information\n- Eligibility criteria\n- Information sources\n- Search strategy\n- Data items\n- Risk of bias assessment\n- Data synthesis\n\n---\n\n### 3. Existing Computer Vision / Deep Learning Content\n\n**File**: `E:\\my-vault\\Dehaze\\Papers\\ORI_MD\\translation-去雾\\translation-去雾.md`\n\nThis is a substantial academic paper (48KB) about laparoscopic image dehazing using computer vision and deep learning. Key structural elements observed:\n\n- **Introduction** with problem motivation and research gap\n- **Method** with mathematical derivations\n- **Subsections** like \"Construction of laparoscopic fog image model\"\n- **Mathematical notation** using LaTeX-style equations (`$...$` and `$$...$$`)\n- **Figures** with captions\n- **Technical depth** including scattering theory, Mie theory, Beer-Lambert Law\n\nThis demonstrates the vault already contains advanced computer vision research content with heavy mathematical notation.\n\n---\n\n### 4. Common Frontmatter/Metadata Patterns\n\n#### YAML Frontmatter (Obsidian Properties)\n**File**: `E:\\my-vault\\.obsidian\\plugins\\skills\\obsidian-markdown\\references\\PROPERTIES.md`\n\nStandard pattern:\n```yaml\n---\ntitle: My Note Title\ndate: 2024-01-15\ntags:\n - project\n - important\naliases:\n - My Note\ncssclasses:\n - custom-class\nstatus: in-progress\nrating: 4.5\n---\n```\n\n#### Academic Frontmatter Patterns\nFrom the templates, common fields include:\n- `source_pdf`\n- `part`\n- `keywords` (3-5 English keywords)\n- `module`\n- `path`\n- `status`\n\n#### Excalidraw Frontmatter\n```yaml\n---\nexcalidraw-plugin: parsed\ntags: [excalidraw]\n---\n```\n\n---\n\n### 5. Vault Structure and README Files\n\n#### Top-Level Directories:\n```\n/e/my-vault\n /copilot # Copilot custom prompts\n /Dehaze # Computer vision project (dehazing)\n /Excalidraw # Drawings and diagrams\n /自动语义分割系统 # Target directory (semantic segmentation)\n```\n\n#### No User-Created README\nThe only README files found are within the `.obsidian/plugins/skills/` directory (academic research skills documentation), not user-created vault documentation.\n\n---\n\n### 6. Formatting Conventions Observed\n\nFrom the templates and existing content:\n\n- **Wiki-links**: `[[Note Name]]` for cross-references\n- **Callouts**: `> [!tip]`, `> [!warning]`, `> [!important]`, `> [!answer]-` (foldable)\n- **Tables**: Extensively used for structured information\n- **Tags**: `#tag-name` format, often nested like `#arch-*` or `#module-*`\n- **ASCII diagrams**: Encouraged for flows and architecture\n- **Bold**: For critical terms and file paths\n- **Code blocks**: With language hints for commands and schemas\n- **Bilingual support**: Mix of English and Chinese content\n\n---\n\n## Recommendations for Structuring \"自动语义分割系统/系统设计.md\"\n\nBased on these findings, I recommend a hybrid structure combining:\n\n1. **Codebase Template** elements (Module Note structure) for technical system documentation\n2. **IMRaD/Research patterns** for academic rigor\n3. **YAML frontmatter** consistent with vault conventions\n\n### Suggested Frontmatter:\n```yaml\n---\ntitle: 自动语义分割系统 — 系统设计\ndate: 2026-04-22\ntags:\n - semantic-segmentation\n - computer-vision\n - deep-learning\n - system-design\nmodule: 自动语义分割系统\npath: 自动语义分割系统\nkeywords: semantic segmentation, computer vision, deep learning, system architecture\nstatus: in-progress\n---\n```\n\n### Suggested Structure:\n1. **系统概述** (System Overview) — Purpose and motivation\n2. **问题定义** (Problem Definition) — What problem this solves\n3. **架构设计** (Architecture Design) — High-level system diagram\n4. **模块设计** (Module Design) — Key components with tables\n5. **数据流** (Data Flow) — Internal flow with ASCII diagrams\n6. **接口定义** (Interface Definition) — APIs and public interfaces\n7. **算法设计** (Algorithm Design) — Model architecture and training pipeline\n8. **实验设计** (Experimental Design) — Evaluation metrics and datasets\n9. **部署方案** (Deployment Plan) — Infrastructure and configuration\n10. **风险评估** (Risk Assessment) — Limitations and mitigation\n11. **相关文档** (Related Documents) — Wiki-links to other notes\n\nThis structure leverages your vault's existing patterns while providing comprehensive coverage for a semantic segmentation system design document."
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
},
|
||
"currentNote": "自动语义分割系统/系统设计.md",
|
||
"externalContextPaths": [
|
||
"E:\\my-vault\\.obsidian\\plugins\\skills"
|
||
],
|
||
"usage": {
|
||
"model": "kimi-for-coding",
|
||
"inputTokens": 20975,
|
||
"cacheCreationInputTokens": 0,
|
||
"cacheReadInputTokens": 0,
|
||
"contextWindow": 200000,
|
||
"contextTokens": 20975,
|
||
"percentage": 10
|
||
}
|
||
} |