61 lines
1.6 KiB
YAML
61 lines
1.6 KiB
YAML
name: Workflow gap
|
|
description: Report a missing, weak, or awkward handoff in a research workflow, even if nothing is technically broken.
|
|
title: "[Workflow gap]: "
|
|
labels:
|
|
- workflow
|
|
body:
|
|
- type: markdown
|
|
attributes:
|
|
value: |
|
|
Use this template when Claude Scholar technically works, but the workflow is still incomplete.
|
|
|
|
Examples:
|
|
- the workflow stops too early,
|
|
- a handoff between stages is weak,
|
|
- the current output is not enough for real research use,
|
|
- or an expected research step is missing.
|
|
|
|
- type: dropdown
|
|
id: stage
|
|
attributes:
|
|
label: Workflow stage
|
|
options:
|
|
- Ideation
|
|
- Literature review
|
|
- Zotero / paper intake
|
|
- Obsidian / project memory
|
|
- Experiment tracking
|
|
- Results analysis
|
|
- Publication artifacts (figures / tables)
|
|
- Results reporting
|
|
- Paper writing
|
|
- Rebuttal / review response
|
|
- Post-acceptance
|
|
- Cross-stage handoff
|
|
validations:
|
|
required: true
|
|
|
|
- type: textarea
|
|
id: gap
|
|
attributes:
|
|
label: Current gap
|
|
description: What is missing, awkward, or incomplete in the current workflow?
|
|
validations:
|
|
required: true
|
|
|
|
- type: textarea
|
|
id: desired_outcome
|
|
attributes:
|
|
label: Desired outcome
|
|
description: What should Claude Scholar help you produce, decide, or hand off here?
|
|
validations:
|
|
required: true
|
|
|
|
- type: textarea
|
|
id: example
|
|
attributes:
|
|
label: Concrete example
|
|
description: Provide a representative prompt, artifact path, or research situation.
|
|
validations:
|
|
required: true
|