name: Workflow gap description: Report a missing, weak, or awkward handoff in a research workflow, even if nothing is technically broken. title: "[Workflow gap]: " labels: - workflow body: - type: markdown attributes: value: | Use this template when Claude Scholar technically works, but the workflow is still incomplete. Examples: - the workflow stops too early, - a handoff between stages is weak, - the current output is not enough for real research use, - or an expected research step is missing. - type: dropdown id: stage attributes: label: Workflow stage options: - Ideation - Literature review - Zotero / paper intake - Obsidian / project memory - Experiment tracking - Results analysis - Publication artifacts (figures / tables) - Results reporting - Paper writing - Rebuttal / review response - Post-acceptance - Cross-stage handoff validations: required: true - type: textarea id: gap attributes: label: Current gap description: What is missing, awkward, or incomplete in the current workflow? validations: required: true - type: textarea id: desired_outcome attributes: label: Desired outcome description: What should Claude Scholar help you produce, decide, or hand off here? validations: required: true - type: textarea id: example attributes: label: Concrete example description: Provide a representative prompt, artifact path, or research situation. validations: required: true