backup materials and knowledge-base docs
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
|
||||
# `nature-writing` skill
|
||||
|
||||
A Nature-style manuscript writing skill for drafting or rebuilding sections from
|
||||
author-provided claims, figures, results, notes, or Chinese drafts.
|
||||
|
||||
## What it does
|
||||
|
||||
`nature-writing` helps write:
|
||||
|
||||
- titles
|
||||
- abstracts
|
||||
- introductions
|
||||
- results narratives
|
||||
- discussions
|
||||
- conclusions
|
||||
- significance paragraphs
|
||||
- manuscript outlines
|
||||
|
||||
It is for argument construction and section drafting. For sentence-level polish
|
||||
of an existing draft, use `nature-polishing`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Built from
|
||||
|
||||
Close reading of curated Nature and Nature Communications research articles
|
||||
across materials, energy systems, construction decarbonization and machine
|
||||
learning, combined with the existing writing-strategy rules in this repository.
|
||||
|
||||
Section-level writing and reviewer-facing self-review guidance is also adapted
|
||||
from Prof. Peng Sida's open research-writing notes:
|
||||
|
||||
- https://pengsida.notion.site/c1a22465a0fa4b15a12985223916048e
|
||||
- https://github.com/pengsida/learning_research
|
||||
|
||||
## File structure
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
nature-writing/
|
||||
├── README.md
|
||||
├── SKILL.md
|
||||
└── references/
|
||||
├── abstract.md
|
||||
├── article-architecture.md
|
||||
├── chinese-author-workflow.md
|
||||
├── conclusion.md
|
||||
├── experiments.md
|
||||
├── introduction.md
|
||||
├── method.md
|
||||
├── paper-review.md
|
||||
├── paragraph-flow.md
|
||||
├── related-work.md
|
||||
└── examples/
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Key rules
|
||||
|
||||
| Domain | Core rule |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Evidence first | Do not invent data, mechanisms, statistics, sample sizes or novelty |
|
||||
| Abstract | Context, gap, approach, key result, implication, boundary |
|
||||
| Introduction | Field scale, bottleneck, prior attempts, unresolved gap, present study |
|
||||
| Method | Explain module motivation, design, forward process, and technical advantage |
|
||||
| Results | Build an evidence ladder, not a chronological lab diary |
|
||||
| Experiments | Tie every major claim to comparison, ablation, metric, or stress-test evidence |
|
||||
| Discussion | Explain meaning, prior-work relation, constraints and future use |
|
||||
| Review | Run adversarial self-review before submission |
|
||||
| Chinese notes | Translate intent and argument, not clause order |
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user