backup materials and knowledge-base docs

文档润色流和知识库构建流/claude-scholar-upstream/skills/nature-response/tests/evaluation-summary.md

@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+# Evaluation summary
+
+`nature-response` is evaluated with synthetic Markdown fixtures. These tests are not executable
+unit tests; they are behavior contracts for manual and agent review.
+
+## Status rationale
+
+Recommended status: `Beta`.
+
+Rationale:
+
+- The core rules are defined in `SKILL.md` and modular references.
+- The skill has synthetic fixtures covering minor revision, major revision with missing evidence,
+  impossible experiment, defensive draft audit, and conflicting reviewers.
+- Each fixture includes expected behavior, forbidden behavior, and pass/fail criteria.
+- The examples show expected output shape without using real confidential reviewer comments.
+- The skill has not yet been validated on real anonymized revision packages, so `Stable` would be premature.
+
+## Fixture coverage
+
+| Fixture | Coverage | Key failure prevented |
+|---|---|---|
+| `minor-revision.md` | stable IDs, minor comments, missing citation metadata | fabricated citation or line numbers |
+| `major-revision-missing-evidence.md` | validation request, statistical details, missing evidence | invented results or p-values |
+| `impossible-experiment.md` | out-of-scope longitudinal evidence | time/funding excuse or fabricated survival data |
+| `defensive-draft-audit.md` | hostile draft language, vague compliance | accusatory reviewer language |
+| `conflicting-reviewers.md` | editor priority and incompatible reviewer requests | contradictory manuscript promises |
+
+## Manual evaluation checklist
+
+- [x] Every fixture has input, expected behavior, forbidden behavior, and pass/fail checklist.
+- [x] No fixture uses real reviewer comments.
+- [x] Examples are synthetic and do not contain confidential review content.
+- [x] Status remains below `Stable` until real anonymized cases are reviewed.
+
+## Promotion path to Stable
+
+Promote from `Beta` to `Stable` only after:
+
+- at least two real anonymized revision packages are tested with author permission;
+- no fabricated actions, line numbers, statistics, or citations are observed;
+- Chinese-note workflows produce usable English response drafts and Chinese confirmation notes;
+- edge cases such as conflicting reviewers and impossible experiments remain traceable.