backup materials and knowledge-base docs
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
|
||||
# Example: Writing Revision Feedback
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
主要问题:这段话的贡献句太散,读者读完不知道 novelty 在哪里。
|
||||
|
||||
为什么重要:
|
||||
- 现在同时讲了 framework、dataset、analysis 和 generalization。
|
||||
- 四个点都对,但没有排序,导致最强贡献被稀释。
|
||||
|
||||
建议改法:
|
||||
- 第一句只保留核心贡献。
|
||||
- 第二句给证据。
|
||||
- 第三句写限制或边界。
|
||||
|
||||
可改成:
|
||||
"We introduce X, a retrieval-augmented summarization framework that separates evidence selection from response generation. Across three benchmark datasets, X improves factual consistency by Y while preserving summary relevance. The method is designed for long-document NLP settings where source grounding matters more than stylistic compression alone."
|
||||
```
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user