backup materials and knowledge-base docs
This commit is contained in:
admin
@@ -0,0 +1,144 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: daily-paper-generator
|
||||
description: Use when the user asks to generate daily paper digests on a general topic. This skill supports both arXiv and bioRxiv (or either one), then produces structured Chinese/English summaries for selected papers.
|
||||
version: 0.5.1
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Daily Paper Generator
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
|
||||
Discover, screen, and summarize recent papers for any research topic.
|
||||
|
||||
Supported sources:
|
||||
- arXiv
|
||||
- bioRxiv
|
||||
- both (`--source both`)
|
||||
|
||||
Core workflow:
|
||||
1. Define topic query and time window
|
||||
2. Search papers from arXiv / bioRxiv
|
||||
3. Select Top 10 candidates per field
|
||||
4. Score and narrow to Top 3 per field
|
||||
5. Choose Top 1 per field
|
||||
6. Generate bilingual summaries
|
||||
7. Save outputs to `daily paper/`
|
||||
|
||||
## When to Use
|
||||
|
||||
Use this skill when:
|
||||
- The user asks for a daily/weekly paper digest on any topic
|
||||
- The user wants recent papers from arXiv and/or bioRxiv
|
||||
- The user needs structured bilingual notes for reading and tracking
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Format
|
||||
|
||||
Each summary should contain:
|
||||
1. Paper title
|
||||
2. Authors and venue/source
|
||||
3. Link(s) and date
|
||||
4. Chinese review (~300 words)
|
||||
5. English review (concise academic prose)
|
||||
6. Metadata table
|
||||
7. Appendix (optional resources)
|
||||
|
||||
## Quick Reference
|
||||
|
||||
| Task | Method |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Search papers | Use `scripts/arxiv_search.py` with `--source arxiv|biorxiv|both` |
|
||||
| Topic selection | Use general-topic queries from `references/keywords.md` |
|
||||
| Evaluate quality | Use `references/quality-criteria.md` |
|
||||
| Write Chinese review | Use `references/writing-style.md` |
|
||||
| Write English review | Follow scientific writing best practices |
|
||||
|
||||
## Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 1: Define query
|
||||
|
||||
Choose a concrete topic query. Examples:
|
||||
- `test-time adaptation for medical imaging`
|
||||
- `multimodal foundation model for healthcare`
|
||||
- `protein language model interpretability`
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 2: Search arXiv and/or bioRxiv
|
||||
|
||||
Use helper script:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
python skills/daily-paper-generator/scripts/arxiv_search.py \
|
||||
--query "test-time adaptation for medical imaging" \
|
||||
--source both \
|
||||
--months 1 \
|
||||
--max-results 80 \
|
||||
--output /tmp/papers.json
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Notes:
|
||||
- `--source arxiv`: arXiv only
|
||||
- `--source biorxiv`: bioRxiv only
|
||||
- `--source both`: merge both sources and sort by date
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 3: Top 10 candidate selection (per field)
|
||||
|
||||
For each candidate paper:
|
||||
1. Check topic relevance from title + abstract
|
||||
2. Remove obviously off-topic papers
|
||||
3. Keep **Top 10 candidates** for this field
|
||||
|
||||
Minimum rule:
|
||||
- Do not jump directly from raw search results to final paper.
|
||||
- Keep an explicit Top 10 list first.
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 4: Top 3 quality shortlist (per field)
|
||||
|
||||
For the Top 10 pool:
|
||||
1. Score each paper with `references/quality-criteria.md`
|
||||
2. Rank by weighted score
|
||||
3. Keep **Top 3**
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 5: Final Top 1 selection (per field)
|
||||
|
||||
For the Top 3 shortlist:
|
||||
1. Compare novelty + method completeness + experimental credibility
|
||||
2. Check practical impact for the field
|
||||
3. Select **Top 1** as the final pick
|
||||
|
||||
Required output trace:
|
||||
- Top 10 candidate list
|
||||
- Top 3 scored shortlist (with weighted scores)
|
||||
- Final Top 1 and one-paragraph selection rationale
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 6: Generate bilingual summaries
|
||||
|
||||
For each selected paper, generate:
|
||||
- 中文评语：背景、挑战、贡献、方法、结果、局限
|
||||
- English Review: concise, factual, non-formulaic
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 7: Save output
|
||||
|
||||
Recommended directory and naming:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
daily paper/
|
||||
YYYY-MM-DD-HHMM-paper-1.md
|
||||
YYYY-MM-DD-HHMM-paper-2.md
|
||||
YYYY-MM-DD-HHMM-paper-3.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Additional Resources
|
||||
|
||||
- `references/keywords.md`: general-topic query templates
|
||||
- `references/quality-criteria.md`: scoring rubric
|
||||
- `references/writing-style.md`: review writing style
|
||||
- `example/daily paper example.md`: output example
|
||||
- `scripts/arxiv_search.py`: arXiv + bioRxiv search helper
|
||||
|
||||
## Important Notes
|
||||
|
||||
1. Use explicit topic queries, avoid single-word vague queries.
|
||||
2. Keep the time window explicit (`--months N`).
|
||||
3. Distinguish source in metadata (`arxiv` vs `biorxiv`).
|
||||
4. Use the fixed narrowing rule: **Top 10 -> Top 3 -> Top 1** (per field).
|
||||
5. If a paper lacks robust evaluation, mark confidence and limitations clearly.
|
||||
6. Do not fabricate unavailable fields (institution/GitHub/code links).
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user