BZJZ_Material/文档润色流和知识库构建流/claude-scholar/skills/nature-response/references/action-mapping.md

Action mapping

Use this file to map every reviewer concern to a concrete response action.

Action labels

Action label	Meaning	Use when
ACCEPT_TEXT	Revised wording, structure, title, abstract, Methods detail, Discussion, or legend	The author supplied or can supply a text change
ACCEPT_ANALYSIS	Added or revised analysis	The response depends on real analysis output
ACCEPT_EXPERIMENT	Added experimental data	The author performed a real experiment and supplied enough detail
ACCEPT_FIGURE	Added or modified figure, table, panel, legend, or supplement	A visual or tabular item addresses the concern
CLARIFY_EXISTING	Existing data already address the concern, but manuscript presentation needed clarification	The evidence exists and location can be cited
ADD_CITATION	Added verified citation	The citation is genuinely relevant and metadata is supplied or flagged
SOFTEN_CLAIM	Reduced claim strength or added boundary	The original claim was too broad, causal, novel, clinical, or mechanistic
PARTIAL	Partly addressed with explicit remaining limitation	A valid concern cannot be fully resolved in the revision
DISAGREE	Respectfully disagree with evidence or scope-based reasoning	The reviewer interpretation is not supported by the manuscript facts
OUT_OF_SCOPE	Valid suggestion but outside current manuscript scope	The request requires a new cohort, system, longitudinal design, or different study
AUTHOR_INPUT_NEEDED	Cannot draft final answer without real details	The author note is vague, missing, or unsupported
BLOCKING	Revision cannot be credible until author action occurs	Missing ethics, compliance, central evidence, integrity explanation, or required data

Internal tracker fields

Use this shape internally when organizing a response:

comment_id: R1.3
reviewer: Reviewer 1
severity: major
category: methodological
action: ACCEPT_ANALYSIS
author_input_needed: true
readiness: draft_with_placeholders
risk_level: high
manuscript_location: Methods; Results; Supplementary Fig. S2

Readiness state

State	Meaning
ready_to_submit	Enough facts are supplied to draft final text with traceable manuscript location
draft_with_placeholders	Draft can proceed, but placeholders must remain visible
needs_author_input	Do not draft final wording until author supplies facts
blocked	Revision response would be misleading or non-credible without author action

Risk level

Risk	Use when
low	Wording, format, or straightforward clarification
medium	Citation, figure, method detail, or presentation issue requiring verification
high	Evidence, statistics, validation, claim strength, or out-of-scope request
blocking	Ethics, compliance, data integrity, missing central evidence, or unsupported response

Mapping rules

• If the author says only "we revised it", use AUTHOR_INPUT_NEEDED until the location and nature of the revision are known.
• If the author says "we added an experiment", request experiment name, condition, sample size or replicate unit, result summary, and figure/table location.
• If the author says "we added a citation", request verified bibliographic detail unless already supplied.
• If a reviewer asks for impossible or out-of-scope work, use PARTIAL or OUT_OF_SCOPE plus claim softening or limitation.
• If a reviewer is factually wrong, usually combine CLARIFY_EXISTING with a small text clarification.
• If a central claim remains unsupported, use SOFTEN_CLAIM or BLOCKING, not confident compliance language.