5.2 KiB
5.2 KiB
Policy Principles
Use this file when deciding what a Nature-ready data statement must disclose.
Governing rules
- Every original research article needs a Data Availability statement.
- The statement must say what supporting data exist, where they can be found, and any access conditions.
- The statement must cover data generated by the study and secondary data reused for analysis.
- Public repository deposition is preferred. For community-mandated data types, use the required repository.
- Reviewers may need access to underlying data and code during evaluation.
- Restrictions are allowed only when they are justified and disclosed. Privacy, consent, endangered locations, third-party licences, commercial restrictions, and national law are common reasons.
- Restricted data still need a durable access route: named data access committee, institution, controlled-access repository, application procedure, or responsible group.
- The statement should not hide key evidence in vague language such as "data available upon reasonable request" unless the reason and process are explicit.
Minimal dataset test
Ask whether an independent reader can inspect or reproduce the paper's central findings from the available material.
Include:
- source data for main figures and key supplementary figures
- raw or sufficiently reusable data, according to community norms
- processed data used for statistics, plots, model training, or validation
- analysis-ready tables if raw data require specialized transformation
- third-party datasets with source, version, date accessed when relevant, and licence/access terms
- representative metadata for restricted datasets, even when records themselves cannot be public
Exclude only when defensible:
- data that were not used to support a result
- purely theoretical work that generated or analysed no dataset
- identifiable human data that cannot be anonymised or shared under consent and law
Availability routes
Use one route per dataset or dataset family.
| Route | Use when | Statement must include |
|---|---|---|
| Public repository | Data can be openly shared | repository, DOI/accession, dataset title or scope, licence if known |
| Controlled repository | Data are sensitive but discoverable | repository, accession/record, access committee or procedure, restrictions |
| Supplementary/source data | Small supporting files are hosted with paper | exact file/table/source-data mapping |
| Reused public data | The study analyses existing public data | original repository/source, identifier, version/date accessed if needed |
| Third-party restricted | Data are licensed or owned by another party | owner/source, why not public, request route, permission condition |
| Request-based access | No repository route is possible | reason, responsible group, eligibility, expected conditions, contact route |
| Not applicable | No datasets were generated or analysed | concise reason; do not use for studies with any empirical data |
Data, code, materials, protocols
Data Availability is not a substitute for code, materials, or protocol availability.
- Put custom code in a Code Availability section when the journal separates it.
- Mention code in Data Availability only when it is bundled with the dataset and needed to interpret files.
- For unique biological materials, reagents, cell lines, plasmids, or model organisms, use persistent identifiers where available and state distribution restrictions separately.
- For protocols, cite protocol repositories or include enough method detail for reproducibility.
Sensitive and human-participant data
For sensitive data, preserve transparency without breaching consent or law.
State:
- why open sharing is not possible
- whether anonymised, aggregate, synthetic, or representative data can be shared
- where metadata or a summary record is available
- who reviews access requests
- what approval, data-use agreement, or ethics condition applies
- whether access is limited to non-commercial, academic, local-jurisdiction, or qualified users
Avoid:
- naming a single individual as the only durable access route when an institutional route exists
- implying data are available if access depends on impossible or undefined permissions
- promising public release later without a repository, date, and responsible party
Submission-stage checks
Before finalizing, confirm:
- all accession numbers, DOIs, and URLs resolve
- embargoed/private reviewer links work anonymously where required
- restricted data metadata records are public if the records themselves are not
- supplementary files match statement wording
- data citations appear in the reference list where the journal expects them
- no claim depends on unavailable data without explanation
Source notes
- Springer Nature research data policy requires Data Availability statements for original articles and asks authors to describe available data, location, and access terms.
- Nature Portfolio reporting standards require prompt availability of data, materials, code, and associated protocols, with restrictions disclosed to editors at submission.
- Scientific Data policy favours repository deposition, especially for primary data, and requires repository hosting for Data Descriptor datasets.