Files
2026-06-11 03:33:14 +08:00

1.1 KiB

Example 8 — Review an existing figure or table draft

User-style prompt

Here is my current results figure screenshot and the draft benchmark table. Please tell me what is weak, whether the figure should stay a figure or become a figure + table pair, and give me the recommended pubfig/pubtab revision path.

Expected skill interpretation

  • artifact: review / revision
  • maturity: existing deliverable upgrade
  • structure: figure-only or figure + companion table
  • goal: keep the strongest communication role for each artifact instead of polishing a weak form blindly

Preferred route

  • inspect the current figure/table role split first
  • recommend whether the figure should stay visual and the table should preserve exact values
  • use pubfig for the figure revision and pubtab for the table revision when both are needed

Minimum acceptable output shape

  • identify the concrete publication weaknesses in the current artifact(s)
  • say whether the final deliverable should be figure-only, table-only, or figure + table
  • provide one runnable pubfig and/or pubtab revision route
  • define explicit export filenames and a short QA checklist