first commit

文档润色流和知识库构建流/claude-scholar/skills/results-analysis/examples/example-stats-appendix.md

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+# Statistical Appendix
+
+## Primary Metric
+- Word Error Rate (WER), lower is better.
+
+## Sample Structure
+- Unit of analysis: seed-level run, paired by shared data split and subject pool.
+- Number of seeds per condition: 5.
+
+## Descriptive Statistics
+
+| Condition | Mean WER | Std | 95% CI |
+|---|---:|---:|---:|
+| Full fine-tuning | 31.4 | 1.9 | [29.8, 33.0] |
+| Subject Adapter | 33.2 | 1.3 | [32.1, 34.3] |
+| Frozen Encoder | 37.0 | 2.1 | [35.1, 38.9] |
+
+## Assumption Checks
+- Shapiro-Wilk on paired differences: `p = 0.19`
+- No strong evidence against normality for the primary contrast.
+- Given small n, interpretation remains conservative.
+
+## Inferential Tests
+
+| Contrast | Test | Statistic | p | Effect size | Correction |
+|---|---|---|---:|---:|---|
+| Subject Adapter vs Frozen Encoder | paired t-test | `t(4) = -4.11` | 0.014 | Cohen's `d = 1.84` | Holm |
+| Full fine-tuning vs Subject Adapter | paired t-test | `t(4) = -2.03` | 0.112 | Cohen's `d = 0.91` | Holm |
+
+## Interpretation Guardrails
+- First contrast is supported after correction.
+- Second contrast trends in favor of full fine-tuning but is not conclusive at this sample size.
+
+## Blockers / Limits
+- No subject-level bootstrap yet.
+- No calibration analysis available.