first commit

文档润色流和知识库构建流/claude-scholar/skills/publication-chart-skill/references/publication-qa-checklist.md

@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+# Publication QA Checklist
+
+## Figure QA
+
+Check:
+
+- Is the chart family appropriate for the scientific claim?
+- Are axes labeled clearly, with units when needed?
+- Is category ordering meaningful and stable?
+- Are color choices readable in grayscale or for color-deficient readers?
+- Are fonts, line weights, and marker sizes internally consistent?
+- Is the legend necessary, and if so, is it compact?
+- Does the figure stay readable after downscaling to likely paper width?
+- If multi-panel, are labels, spacing, and styling consistent across panels?
+- Does the caption need exact numbers that should instead live in a table?
+
+## Table QA
+
+Check:
+
+- Is a table actually the right artifact, or should a companion figure exist?
+- Are row/column labels short but unambiguous?
+- Are important values easy to locate?
+- Is the caption specific enough to stand alone?
+- Is the table too dense for the main paper and better suited to appendix?
+- If two-column format matters, was width/span considered explicitly?
+- Was a preview rendered before treating the table as final?
+
+## Mixed deliverable QA
+
+If both a figure and table are present:
+
+- Does each have a distinct role?
+- Is the figure carrying pattern perception?
+- Is the table preserving exact values?
+- Is there duplication that should be reduced?
+
+## Revision questions
+
+If the artifact is weak, ask:
+
+- Should the chart family change?
+- Should exact values move into a table?
+- Should the artifact split into two panels?
+- Should labels or legends be simplified?
+- Should export width/format change?
+- Should the artifact move from figure-first to table-first, or the reverse?