first commit

文档润色流和知识库构建流/claude-scholar/skills/publication-chart-skill/examples/01-benchmark-comparison-figure.md

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+# Example 1 — Benchmark comparison figure
+
+## User-style prompt
+
+Help me make a publication-quality benchmark comparison figure for six methods across three datasets.
+
+## Expected skill interpretation
+
+- artifact: figure
+- maturity: publication-ready generation
+- structure: single panel
+- goal: fast comparison across methods and datasets
+
+## Preferred route
+
+- primary tool: `pubfig`
+- likely family: `grouped_scatter` or `bar_scatter`
+- companion table: optional, only if exact values must be preserved nearby
+
+## Minimum acceptable output shape
+
+- explain why the chosen comparison form is better than a raw grouped bar if density is high
+- provide a minimal `pubfig` implementation
+- provide one explicit export command/path such as `benchmark.pdf`
+- provide a short QA note about readability, legend density, and category ordering

文档润色流和知识库构建流/claude-scholar/skills/publication-chart-skill/examples/02-ablation-figure.md

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+# Example 2 — Ablation figure
+
+## User-style prompt
+
+Turn these ablation results into a paper-ready figure that makes the contribution of each module easy to read.
+
+## Expected skill interpretation
+
+- artifact: figure
+- maturity: publication-ready generation
+- structure: single panel or compact paired panel
+- goal: isolate incremental effect clearly
+
+## Preferred route
+
+- primary tool: `pubfig`
+- likely family: `dumbbell` or `paired` for low-cardinality paired ablations, otherwise a compact grouped comparison chart or companion table
+- do not default to a crowded decorative chart
+
+## Minimum acceptable output shape
+
+- recommend the ablation-focused visual form and why
+- provide runnable `pubfig` code
+- export to a paper-ready format
+- include a QA note on baseline clarity and ordering

文档润色流和知识库构建流/claude-scholar/skills/publication-chart-skill/examples/03-calibration-evaluation-figure.md

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+# Example 3 — Calibration / evaluation figure
+
+## User-style prompt
+
+I need a publication-quality evaluation figure showing whether my predicted probabilities are calibrated.
+
+## Expected skill interpretation
+
+- artifact: figure
+- maturity: publication-ready generation
+- structure: single panel
+- goal: diagnostic evaluation, not generic trend plotting
+
+## Preferred route
+
+- primary tool: `pubfig`
+- likely family: `calibration`
+- related alternatives: ROC / PR only if the scientific question changes
+
+## Minimum acceptable output shape
+
+- explain why calibration is the right diagnostic form
+- provide minimal runnable code
+- export to PDF or SVG
+- include QA on labels, reference lines, and downscaled readability

文档润色流和知识库构建流/claude-scholar/skills/publication-chart-skill/examples/04-forest-diagnostic-figure.md

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+# Example 4 — Forest / diagnostic figure
+
+## User-style prompt
+
+Help me convert these effect estimates and confidence intervals into a paper-quality figure.
+
+## Expected skill interpretation
+
+- artifact: figure
+- maturity: publication-ready generation
+- structure: single panel
+- goal: communicate effect size with uncertainty
+
+## Preferred route
+
+- primary tool: `pubfig`
+- likely family: `forest_plot`
+- table may accompany it in appendix if exact values are numerous
+
+## Minimum acceptable output shape
+
+- identify forest plot as the default route
+- provide the required arrays/arguments shape
+- export a paper-ready artifact
+- include QA on reference line, label clarity, and ordering

文档润色流和知识库构建流/claude-scholar/skills/publication-chart-skill/examples/05-publication-table-from-excel.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+# Example 5 — Publication-ready LaTeX table from Excel
+
+## User-style prompt
+
+Convert this Excel benchmark sheet into a publication-ready LaTeX table and give me a preview path before I paste it into the paper.
+
+## Expected skill interpretation
+
+- artifact: table
+- maturity: publication-ready generation
+- structure: single table
+- goal: exact benchmark values in LaTeX
+
+## Preferred route
+
+- primary tool: `pubtab`
+- likely route: `xlsx2tex` + `preview`
+- for a robust preview-first workflow, preview the table body first and keep final caption/label handling as a separate manuscript-facing step when needed
+- `tabularray` only if the manuscript/backend requires it
+
+## Minimum acceptable output shape
+
+- provide the exact `pubtab` command or Python route
+- include caption/label guidance when appropriate, but do not force them into the preview-first route
+- include preview generation
+- mention table width/span concerns if relevant

文档润色流和知识库构建流/claude-scholar/skills/publication-chart-skill/examples/06-mixed-figure-table-results.md

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+# Example 6 — Mixed figure + table deliverable
+
+## User-style prompt
+
+For this results section, I want one summary figure and one companion table: the figure should show the overall pattern, and the table should preserve the exact metrics.
+
+## Expected skill interpretation
+
+- artifact: mixed deliverable
+- maturity: publication-ready generation
+- structure: one figure plus one table
+- goal: split visual summary from exact evidence
+
+## Preferred route
+
+- figure: `pubfig`
+- table: `pubtab`
+- each artifact should have a distinct communication role
+
+## Minimum acceptable output shape
+
+- explicitly separate figure and table responsibilities
+- provide one minimal `pubfig` route and one minimal `pubtab` route
+- define export filenames for both
+- include QA on redundancy and role separation

文档润色流和知识库构建流/claude-scholar/skills/publication-chart-skill/examples/07-revision-from-weak-chart.md

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+# Example 7 — Revision from a weak chart request
+
+## User-style prompt
+
+I was thinking of using a radar chart for these benchmark results. Can you improve this into something publication-quality?
+
+## Expected skill interpretation
+
+- artifact: revision task
+- maturity: review/revision
+- structure: likely single figure or figure+table alternative
+- goal: replace a weak chart choice with a stronger one
+
+## Preferred route
+
+- review the proposed radar choice critically
+- recommend a stronger alternative such as grouped scatter, line, or a table depending on the claim
+- only keep radar if the profile comparison is genuinely the right representation
+
+## Minimum acceptable output shape
+
+- explain why the original chart is weak or risky
+- recommend a better artifact type
+- provide the replacement implementation route
+- include targeted QA / revision notes, not vague style comments

文档润色流和知识库构建流/claude-scholar/skills/publication-chart-skill/examples/08-review-existing-figure-or-table.md

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+# Example 8 — Review an existing figure or table draft
+
+## User-style prompt
+
+Here is my current results figure screenshot and the draft benchmark table. Please tell me what is weak, whether the figure should stay a figure or become a figure + table pair, and give me the recommended pubfig/pubtab revision path.
+
+## Expected skill interpretation
+
+- artifact: review / revision
+- maturity: existing deliverable upgrade
+- structure: figure-only or figure + companion table
+- goal: keep the strongest communication role for each artifact instead of polishing a weak form blindly
+
+## Preferred route
+
+- inspect the current figure/table role split first
+- recommend whether the figure should stay visual and the table should preserve exact values
+- use `pubfig` for the figure revision and `pubtab` for the table revision when both are needed
+
+## Minimum acceptable output shape
+
+- identify the concrete publication weaknesses in the current artifact(s)
+- say whether the final deliverable should be figure-only, table-only, or figure + table
+- provide one runnable `pubfig` and/or `pubtab` revision route
+- define explicit export filenames and a short QA checklist