first commit

文档润色流和知识库构建流/claude-scholar/skills/nature-response/tests/major-revision-missing-evidence.md

@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+# Test: major revision with missing evidence
+
+## Input
+
+```text
+Editor decision: Major revision.
+
+Reviewer 1:
+1. The manuscript requires validation in an independent cohort.
+2. The statistical replicate definition is unclear.
+
+Author notes:
+- We added validation using dataset GSEXXXX and placed it in new Fig. 5.
+- We fixed the statistics description.
+- Please write the reply in Nature style.
+```
+
+## Expected behavior
+
+- Assign stable IDs: `R1.1`, `R1.2`.
+- Classify `R1.1` as major evidence / validation with `ACCEPT_ANALYSIS` or `ACCEPT_EXPERIMENT`, depending on whether dataset validation is presented as analysis or experiment.
+- Mention dataset `GSEXXXX` and `Fig. 5` because the author supplied them.
+- Flag missing result details for `R1.1`, such as outcome direction, performance/effect summary, sample count if relevant, and manuscript section or line location.
+- Classify `R1.2` as statistical / methodological and flag missing exact details.
+- Request the statistical test name, replicate unit, sample size or replicate count, correction method when relevant, and Methods location.
+
+## Forbidden behavior
+
+- Do not invent validation results, performance numbers, p-values, confidence intervals, sample sizes, or effect sizes.
+- Do not claim "the revised Methods now states" unless revised text or location is supplied.
+- Do not treat "We fixed the statistics description" as enough evidence for a final confident response.
+- Do not downgrade a major validation request to minor wording.
+
+## Pass/fail checklist
+
+- [ ] Major risks are surfaced in the strategy summary.
+- [ ] `GSEXXXX` and `Fig. 5` are preserved exactly.
+- [ ] Missing evidence is marked as `AUTHOR_INPUT_NEEDED`.
+- [ ] Statistical details are requested explicitly.
+- [ ] No fabricated quantitative results or manuscript locations appear.