first commit

文档润色流和知识库构建流/claude-scholar/skills/nature-response/references/comment-taxonomy.md

@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
+# Comment taxonomy
+
+Use this file to classify reviewer comments before drafting responses.
+
+## Severity
+
+| Severity | Meaning | Default handling |
+|---|---|---|
+| `minor` | Presentation, clarity, formatting, citation, or small method-detail issue that does not alter the main evidence chain | Usually draftable with text change or citation placeholder |
+| `major` | Evidence, validation, method, statistics, interpretation, or scope issue that may affect claims or editorial confidence | Requires explicit action, evidence, or author input |
+| `blocking` | Ethics, compliance, data integrity, missing required approval, unsupported central claim, or unresolved fatal methodological issue | Do not draft a confident response without author action |
+| `unclear` | Insufficient information to judge severity | Flag for author confirmation |
+
+## Categories
+
+### Editorial / presentation
+
+Includes unclear writing, structure problems, missing definitions, figure readability, title/abstract mismatch, or confusing terminology.
+
+Default strategy:
+
+- Usually `ACCEPT_TEXT` or `ACCEPT_FIGURE`.
+- Revise wording, structure, legend, definition, or abstract-title alignment.
+- Give section, page, line, figure, or placeholder.
+
+### Evidence / interpretation
+
+Includes unsupported claims, overinterpretation, missing control, causal claim not justified, clinical relevance not shown, or alternative explanation.
+
+Default strategy:
+
+- Use `ACCEPT_EXPERIMENT`, `ACCEPT_ANALYSIS`, `SOFTEN_CLAIM`, `CLARIFY_EXISTING`, `PARTIAL`, or `DISAGREE`.
+- Do not invent results.
+- If evidence is absent, soften the claim and add a limitation.
+
+### Methodological
+
+Includes missing method detail, reproducibility issue, missing baseline, missing validation, unclear sample size, software/model/version not stated.
+
+Default strategy:
+
+- Use `ACCEPT_TEXT`, `ACCEPT_ANALYSIS`, or `AUTHOR_INPUT_NEEDED`.
+- Request exact method details when author notes are vague.
+- Map to Methods, Supplementary Methods, protocol, code, or figure/table.
+
+### Statistical
+
+Includes inappropriate test, missing effect size, multiple testing issue, insufficient power, missing confidence interval, unclear replicate definition.
+
+Default strategy:
+
+- Treat major statistical critiques as high risk until details are supplied.
+- Ask for test name, replicate unit, sample size, correction method, effect size, confidence interval, and exact results where relevant.
+- Do not invent p-values, confidence intervals, sample sizes, or effect sizes.
+
+### Data / code / materials
+
+Includes missing accession number, source data unavailable, code not provided, restricted data not justified, FAIR metadata incomplete, materials availability.
+
+Default strategy:
+
+- Use `ACCEPT_TEXT`, `CLARIFY_EXISTING`, `AUTHOR_INPUT_NEEDED`, or `BLOCKING`.
+- Request repository, accession, DOI, license, access route, or restriction reason.
+- Coordinate with `nature-data` if the user asks for full data-availability wording.
+
+### Citation / positioning
+
+Includes missing prior work, inaccurate novelty claim, wrong comparison, field context incomplete, reviewer-requested citation.
+
+Default strategy:
+
+- Use `ADD_CITATION`, `SOFTEN_CLAIM`, `CLARIFY_EXISTING`, or `DISAGREE`.
+- Add citations only when genuinely relevant and verified.
+- Do not fabricate DOI, publication year, title, journal, or authors.
+
+### Scope / feasibility
+
+Includes requested experiments beyond scope, future-work suggestions, journal-fit concerns, transfer-related concerns.
+
+Default strategy:
+
+- Use `PARTIAL`, `OUT_OF_SCOPE`, `SOFTEN_CLAIM`, or `DISAGREE`.
+- Acknowledge scientific value.
+- Give a study-design or scope reason, offer alternative evidence, and add a limitation.
+- Avoid time, funding, or convenience as the primary reason.
+
+### Ethics / compliance
+
+Includes ethics approval missing, consent missing, animal/human-subject reporting, competing interests, image/data integrity, or permissions.
+
+Default strategy:
+
+- Usually `BLOCKING` or `AUTHOR_INPUT_NEEDED`.
+- Request exact approval number, institution, consent statement, reporting checklist, image-processing details, or data-integrity explanation.
+- Do not draft around missing required compliance.