name: Workflow gap
description: Report a missing, weak, or awkward handoff in a research workflow, even if nothing is technically broken.
title: "[Workflow gap]: "
labels:
  - workflow
body:
  - type: markdown
    attributes:
      value: |
        Use this template when Claude Scholar technically works, but the workflow is still incomplete.

        Examples:
        - the workflow stops too early,
        - a handoff between stages is weak,
        - the current output is not enough for real research use,
        - or an expected research step is missing.

  - type: dropdown
    id: stage
    attributes:
      label: Workflow stage
      options:
        - Ideation
        - Literature review
        - Zotero / paper intake
        - Obsidian / project memory
        - Experiment tracking
        - Results analysis
        - Publication artifacts (figures / tables)
        - Results reporting
        - Paper writing
        - Rebuttal / review response
        - Post-acceptance
        - Cross-stage handoff
    validations:
      required: true

  - type: textarea
    id: gap
    attributes:
      label: Current gap
      description: What is missing, awkward, or incomplete in the current workflow?
    validations:
      required: true

  - type: textarea
    id: desired_outcome
    attributes:
      label: Desired outcome
      description: What should Claude Scholar help you produce, decide, or hand off here?
    validations:
      required: true

  - type: textarea
    id: example
    attributes:
      label: Concrete example
      description: Provide a representative prompt, artifact path, or research situation.
    validations:
      required: true
