# Example 7 — Revision from a weak chart request

## User-style prompt

I was thinking of using a radar chart for these benchmark results. Can you improve this into something publication-quality?

## Expected skill interpretation

- artifact: revision task
- maturity: review/revision
- structure: likely single figure or figure+table alternative
- goal: replace a weak chart choice with a stronger one

## Preferred route

- review the proposed radar choice critically
- recommend a stronger alternative such as grouped scatter, line, or a table depending on the claim
- only keep radar if the profile comparison is genuinely the right representation

## Minimum acceptable output shape

- explain why the original chart is weak or risky
- recommend a better artifact type
- provide the replacement implementation route
- include targeted QA / revision notes, not vague style comments
